Search Results for "basic requirements"

2185 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2185 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Quo-Warranto Petitions Challenging KPSC Appointments, Upholds Executive Power Under Article 316. Court Rules That Article 316 is a Complete Code and No Rules are Required for Appointing Chairman and Members of the State Public Service Commission.

Two public interest litigations were filed by Shashi Prasad Gandhi and T. Narasimhamurthy challenging the appointments of the Chairman and members of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Tender for Water Supply and Sewerage System in MIHAN Area. The dispute centered on whether loading of service tax on the lowest bid for evaluation purposes was arbitrary and in violation of pre-bid clarifications.

Background: The dispute arose from a tender floated by Maharashtra Airport Development Company Limited (MADC) for the operation and comprehensive main...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Tender Cancellation in Public Procurement Case — State's Decision to Cancel Tender Upheld as Not Arbitrary Under Article 14 of the Constitution.

The appeal arose from a High Court order dismissing a writ petition challenging the cancellation of a tender by the State. The appellant, a bidder, co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Validity of MRTP Act Provisions. Court holds that Sections 49(7) and 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 are constitutionally valid and not ultra vires Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 21, 21A, 47 and 243(w).

The petitioners, Chalisgaon Municipal Council and a resident, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the constitution...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Transfer of MCOC Case to Sessions Court for Lack of Jurisdiction — Offence Not Under MCOC Act. Special Court Correctly Found No Organized Crime Syndicate or Continuing Unlawful Activity Under Section 2(1)(e) and Section 3 of MCOC Act.

The case involves two appeals against an order dated 7th October 2011 passed by the Special Court under the Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in MRTP Act Case — Notice Under Section 53(1) Challenged as Nullity for Shortfall in Statutory Period. Bar Under Section 149 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 Does Not Apply When Notice Itself Is Invalid for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Period.

The appellant, Kishor S/o Ramalu @ Rambhau Telang, was the original plaintiff who received a notice dated 18.11.2010 under Section 53(1) of the Mahara...