Search Results for "arbitral tribunal jurisdiction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "arbitral tribunal jurisdiction"

1499 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1499 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Construction Contract Dispute. Court upholds rejection of Section 34 application, finding no patent illegality in award allowing contractor's claims despite alleged non-compliance with monthly claim submission clause.

2 Apr 2013

The State of Maharashtra, through the Executive Engineer, appealed against an order of the District Judge-9, Pune, dated 5th July 2007, which rejected...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses NHAI Appeal in Highway Construction Contract Dispute. Arbitral Award for Additional Costs and Embankment Work Upheld as Not Patently Illegal.

7 May 2024

The appellant, National Highways Authority of India (NHAI), awarded a contract to the respondent for construction of the Allahabad Bypass Project. Dis...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Business Transfer Dispute — Upholds Award of Rs. 1.04 Crore with Interest. Court holds that arbitral tribunal's findings on breach of agreement and quantification of damages are not patently illegal and do not warrant interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

15 Jun 2016

The petitioner, Dr. Anjana Singh, proprietress of Central Diagnostic, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996,...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Upholds Arbitral Award and District Court Order in Partnership Dispute. Court holds that findings of fact by arbitrator are not open to reappreciation under Section 34 unless perverse or contrary to public policy.

2 Apr 2026

The appellants, M. Mallikarjuna and Smt. Rajeshwari Mallikarjuna, filed an appeal under Section 37(1)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award in Investment Dispute — Rejects Bias Challenge Based on Non-Disclosure. Failure to disclose by arbitrator does not automatically render award contrary to public policy under Section 48(2)(b) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996; respondents waived objection by participating in arbitration without raising issue.

25 Apr 2023

The petitioner, HSBC PI Holdings (Mauritius) Limited, sought enforcement of a foreign arbitral award against the respondents, Avitel Post Studioz Limi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commercial Arbitration Dispute. Court upholds award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, finding no patent illegality or conflict with public policy.

22 Jul 2026

The petitioner, Ramakrishnan Krishnan, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes District Judge's Order in Land Acquisition Arbitration — Petitioner Allowed to File Objections Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act. The court held that the District Judge's order rejecting the petitioner's application to file objections was without jurisdiction as the petitioner was not given an opportunity to file objections before the award was made rule of the court.

22 Jan 2024

The petitioner, T Younis, was the owner of land bearing Sy.No.503/A1 and 503/B2 in Amarathi village, Hospet. His land was compulsorily acquired by the...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Arbitration Appointment Dispute — High Court Erred in Applying Amended Act and Appointing Independent Arbitrator Without Adhering to Mutually Agreed Procedure. The Court held that pre-amended provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 apply to arbitration requests received before 23rd October, 2015, and the High Court must respect the agreed appointment procedure.

29 Mar 2019

The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals arising from orders of the Rajasthan High Court appointing independent arbitrators under Section 11(6)...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Arbitration Appointment Dispute — Pre-Amendment Act Applies; No Claim Certificate Does Not Bar Arbitration; Mutually Agreed Procedure Must Be Respected

29 Mar 2019

The Supreme Court heard a batch of appeals arising from orders of the Rajasthan High Court appointing independent arbitrators under Section 11(6) of t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Arbitration Appointment Dispute — High Court Erred in Applying Amended Act and Appointing Independent Arbitrator Without Adhering to Mutually Agreed Procedure. The Court held that where requests for arbitration were made before the Amendment Act, 2015 came into force, the pre-amended provisions apply, and the High Court must respect the agreed procedure for appointment of arbitrator under Clause 64(3) of GCC.

29 Mar 2019

The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals arising from orders of the Rajasthan High Court appointing independent arbitrators under Section 11(6)...

36 37 38 39 40

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)