Search Results for "Time Bound Promotion Scheme"

537 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 537 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Part and Refers Question of Law to Larger Bench in MSMED Act Dispute. Registration Under Section 8 of MSMED Act, 2006 Not a Precondition for Reference Under Section 18, but Issue Requires Authoritative Determination by Three-Judge Bench.

The Supreme Court of India heard an appeal by NBCC (India) Ltd. against the State of West Bengal and others, concerning a dispute with M/s Saket Infra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Considers Quo Warranto Petition Alleging Illegal Appointment Against Non-Notified BCT Post in KIADB. Petition Argues That Appointment in Contravention of Advertised Reservation Is Void Ab Initio Under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.

The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by a registered society representing Scheduled Caste, Scheduled Tribe, and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petition Against KERC Order on Solar Power Tariff. The Dispute Centers on Whether Commissioning Certificate or Actual Injection of Power Determines Commercial Operation Date Under the Power Purchase Agreement.

The petitioner, a solar power developer, challenged an order of the Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commission (KERC) that denied a higher tariff by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

FIRST APPEAL NO.514 OF 2014

The appeal arose from a suit dismissed by the trial court for mandatory injunction seeking execution of an agreement for sale of a flat under the Maha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Deemed Conveyance Order Under MOFA Due to Lack of Notice to Developer. Section 11 of MOFA Requires Notice to All Parties Before Granting Unilateral Conveyance.

The petitioners, M/s. ACME Enterprises (a partnership firm) and its partner Mr. Ummedra K. Vardhan, challenged an order dated 26th November 2019 passe...