Search Results for "Reply Statement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Reply Statement"

6848 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6848 result(s)

High Court

Karnataka High Court Hears Regular First Appeal Against Trial Court Decree Declaring Plaintiff as Absolute Owner and Ordering Delivery of Possession. Deemed University's Land Acquisition and Possession Dispute Involving Application of Land Acquisition Act, Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1960, and Section 96 of CPC.

6 Jun 2016

The appeal arose from a suit filed by the National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences (NIMHANS), a deemed university and society registered...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Trial Court's Order Allowing Rejoinder to Amended Written Statement in Civil Suit — Order VIII Rule 9 CPC Permits Rejoinder to New Facts Raised in Amended Pleadings.

5 Dec 2025

The present writ petition was filed by the defendant (Sri H.G. Shekar) challenging an order dated 22.09.2025 passed by the XXIX Additional City Civil ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Holds Section 13(2)(a) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 is Directory — District Forum Can Extend Time for Filing Reply Beyond 45 Days in Exceptional Circumstances. The 30-day period for filing reply commences from receipt of notice by the opposite party.

1 Jan 2020

The Supreme Court Constitution Bench addressed two questions referred regarding Section 13(2)(a) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The first quest...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Quashes Suspension and Charge Memorandum Against Assistant Registrar in Goa University Case — Stale Charges and Unfair Process Violate Article 14. Suspension order set aside and charge memorandum quashed due to inordinate delay, lack of misconduct, and vindictive approach by the University.

27 Jul 2023

The Petitioner, Mrs. Bertha T.A. D'Mello e Daniel, was appointed as Assistant Registrar (Legal) in Goa University on 16/12/2005, effective from 26/11/...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit Involving COVID-19 Vaccine 'COVISHIELD'. The court restrained defendants from using the mark 'COVISHIELD' or any deceptively similar mark for pharmaceutical products, finding a prima facie case of infringement and passing off.

5 Jun 2023

The plaintiffs, Serum Institute of India Pvt. Ltd. and another, filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against the defendants, Yohan ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Trial Court Order in Execution Proceedings for Overreaching Earlier Decree — Bailiff Directed to Execute Decree as Per Original Terms Without Deviation. The court held that the executing court cannot modify the decree or add conditions not found in the decree, and the impugned order was set aside under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.

14 Aug 2012

The petitioners, Prabhakar Ramchandra Desai and others, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order date...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Due to Unexplained Delay Snapping Live Link. Preventive Detention Order Under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA Act, 1974 Set Aside as Delay Between Last Smuggling Activity and Order Was Unexplained.

21 Mar 2005

The petitioner, a friend of the detenu Joshy Mathew, challenged the detention order dated 3rd May 2004 issued under Section 3(1) of the Conservation o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Commodity Brokerage Dispute — Upholds Tribunal's Finding That Broker Failed to Prove Client's Liability. Member Client Agreement and Running Account Basis Did Not Shift Burden of Proof to Client Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

16 Apr 2015

The petitioner, Bonanza Commodities Brokers Pvt. Ltd., a member of Multi Commodity Exchange of India Ltd. (MCX), filed a petition under Section 34 of ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Ejectment Suit — Tenant's Denial of Landlord's Title Forfeits Protection Under Rent Control Act. The tenant's denial of title and chronic default in rent payment entitles the landlord to decree for ejectment under Section 111(g) of Transfer of Property Act, 1882.

11 Dec 2019

The appellant-plaintiff filed a suit for ejectment against the respondent-defendant, alleging that the defendant was a tenant under one Smt. Chinnamma...

High Court

GST on Advances for Future Supplies: Examining Constitutional Validity. Evaluating GST's application to unutilized advances and its constitutionality.

14 Nov 2024

The L&T IHI Consortium, a collaboration between Larsen & Toubro Ltd. (L&T) and IHI Infrastructure Systems Co. Ltd., Japan, challenged the ...

36 37 38 39 40

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)