Search Results for "Prevention of Corruption Act"

461 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 461 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Discharge of Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Conspiracy or Misappropriation. Applicant, a Medical Superintendent, was not shown to have any role in the alleged conspiracy or misappropriation of government funds.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by Dr. Narendra Mawale, accused No.5 in Special Case No.5 of 2009, challenging the order dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Shailendra Manikrao Bakare, was convicted by the Special Judge, Pune, for offences under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Chandrakant Nivrutti Pagar, a Talathi, was convicted by the Special Judge (Anti Corruption), Nashik for offences under Sections 7, 13(1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Release on Ground of Illegal Detention in Corruption Case — No Violation of Article 22(2) or Section 57 CrPC as Arrest Was at 11:45 PM and Production Within 24 Hours Was Not Possible Due to Distance and Night Hours.

The petitioners, Anil Jaisinghani and Nirmal Rajkumar Jaisinghani, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeki...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Complainant and Lack of Corroboration. Demand for Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order of the Special Court (ACB), Nagpur, dated 6th April 2009, which acquitted the respond...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Padmakar s/o Warlu Alliwar, was a Gram Sewak/clerk in Grampanchayat, Palasgaon. He was convicted by the trial court in Special Case No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in CBI Corruption Case Due to Lack of Evidence. Conviction under Prevention of Corruption Act and IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The judgment pertains to two criminal appeals filed by accused persons convicted by the Special Judge for CBI Cases, Bangalore, in Spl.C.C.No.139 of 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Income Tax Officer in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Corroboration and Unreliable Trap Witnesses. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Smt. K. Chandrika, an Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, was convicted by the Special Judge for CBI Cases, Bangalore, for offences u...