Search Results for "Plaint averments"

1981 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1981 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in Property Dispute — Agreement of Transfer and Re-conveyance Clause Requires Trial. Order VII Rule 11 CPC plaint rejection set aside as suit raises triable issues regarding clause 10 of 1957 agreement and plaintiff's transferee rights.

The appellant, Satish Talakchand Shah, filed a civil suit (Civil Suit No. 1708 of 2010) in the City Civil Court, Mumbai, seeking declaration of owners...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in Property Dispute — Suit Barred by Limitation Under Order 7 Rule 11(d) CPC. Clause 10 of Agreement for Sale Dated 31-03-1957 Was a Right of Re-Conveyance, Not a Contract for Sale, and Cause of Action Arose in 1988.

The appellant, Kishorbhai Premchand Shah, filed a civil suit in the City Civil Court, Mumbai, seeking a declaration of ownership and permanent injunct...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Benami Transaction Suit — Father-Son Relationship Constitutes Fiduciary Capacity Under Section 4(3)(b) of Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988. Plaint cannot be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC when exception is pleaded.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal against the rejection of the plaint by the trial court and the High Court. The appellant, Pawan Kumar, filed a su...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Maintainability of Suit Challenging Slum Acquisition Proceedings. Suit for Declaration of Title and Injunction Held Maintainable Despite Bar Under Section 42 of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against an order dated 12 April 2016 passed by a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court in Suit No.2862 of 20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Commercial Appeal Against Trial Court's Refusal to Grant Interim Injunctions in Trademark Infringement Suit. The Court Addresses Preliminary Objection Regarding Maintainability of the Suit and Appeal Without Board Resolution.

The dispute traces back to a family-run jewellery business started in 1869 by C.Krishnaiah Chetty at No.35, Commercial Street, Bangalore. Over generat...