Search Results for "Land encroachment"

882 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 882 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Writ Petition in Land Encroachment Case — Directs Authorities to Treat Final Notice as Show Cause Notice. Procedural Fairness Under Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 Requires Prior Opportunity of Hearing Before Eviction.

The writ petitioner, K. Kanagaraj, filed a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras High Court challenging a notice i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Removal of Encroachment on Public Park Land — Directs Authorities to Restore Land for Public Use. The court held that land reserved for a park/play area cannot be encroached upon and must be maintained for the community's benefit.

The petitioner, R. Mohan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents 1 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Directs Survey Before Demolition in Encroachment Dispute — No Coercive Action Till Survey Completed. Court orders proper survey of land in S.No. 10/5A in presence of petitioner before any demolition action under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

The petitioner, S. Alaguvel, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers State Government's Leave Application for Regularization Policy in PILs. Court Examines Whether Draft Policy Violates MRTP Act and Whether Judicial Review Permits Interference with Policy Decisions.

The proceedings arise from two Public Interest Litigations (PIL No. 80 of 2013 and PIL No. 138 of 2012) before the Bombay High Court. In an earlier or...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Cheque Bounce Case Due to Failure to Prove Legally Enforceable Debt. Complainant failed to establish that the cheque was issued for a legally enforceable debt or liability under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The appellant, Pradeep Kashiram Kadam, was the original complainant in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (N.I. Act...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Restores Trial Court's Decree for Mandatory Injunction. Court holds that the First Appellate Court's finding on possession was perverse and that the suit for mandatory injunction was not barred by laches.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the legal heirs of the original plaintiff, Shri Gurudas Yeshwant Pednekar, against the judgment of the Firs...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Demolition of Unauthorized Construction on Municipal Land — Held That No Notice Under Section 53A of Transfer of Property Act Is Required for Unauthorized Occupants and That Encroachment on Public Land Cannot Be Regularized.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by different groups of petitioners challenging the demolition of their constructions on land belonging ...