Madras High Court Directs Survey Before Demolition in Encroachment Dispute — No Coercive Action Till Survey Completed. Court orders proper survey of land in S.No. 10/5A in presence of petitioner before any demolition action under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

High Court: Madras High Court
  • 5
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, S. Alaguvel, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, seeking a Writ of Certiorari to quash Order No. 06/2024 dated 31.12.2024 passed by the first respondent, the Assistant Divisional Engineer of the Highways Department (C & M), Tiruchendur. The grievance was that the respondents were taking steps to demolish the petitioner's compound wall on the ground that it encroached upon land in S.No. 10/5A belonging to the Highways Department. The petitioner contended that the claim of encroachment was incorrect and that demolition was being sought without conducting a survey. During the proceedings, the Additional Government Pleader produced a letter dated 13.01.2025 from the Highways Department instructing the Tahsildar to conduct a survey of the land in the presence of the petitioner. The petitioner's counsel also produced a letter indicating that the proposed removal of encroachment had been postponed. In light of these developments, the court directed the respondents to conduct a proper survey of the land in S.No. 10/5A in the presence of the petitioner and thereafter take further action in accordance with law. The court further ordered that no coercive action for removal of the alleged encroachment shall be taken until the survey is completed. The writ petition was disposed of with these directions, and no order as to costs was made. The connected miscellaneous petition was closed.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Writ of Certiorari - Survey before Demolition - Article 226 of the Constitution of India - Petitioner challenged order for demolition of compound wall alleging encroachment on Highways land - Court directed survey in presence of petitioner before any coercive action - Held that proper survey is necessary to ascertain encroachment before demolition (Paras 3-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the respondents can demolish the petitioner's compound wall without conducting a proper survey to determine encroachment.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court directed the respondents to conduct a proper survey of the lands in S.No. 10/5A in the presence of the petitioner and thereafter take further course of action in accordance with law. Till such time the survey is conducted, no coercive action shall be taken for removal of the alleged encroachment. The writ petition was disposed of with these directions, and no order as to costs was made. The connected miscellaneous petition was closed.

Law Points

  • Writ of Certiorari
  • Survey before demolition
  • Natural justice
  • Encroachment removal
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (MAD) (01) 176

W.P.(MD)No.1704 of 2025 and W.M.P.(MD)No.1206 of 2025

2025-01-23

M.S.Ramesh, A.D.Maria Clete

Mr.K.Murali Sankar (for petitioner), Mr.J.Ashok (Additional Government Pleader for respondents 1,2,4,7), Mr.S.Deenadhayalan (Standing Counsel for respondent 5), Mr.P.Kottaisamy (Government Advocate [Crl. Side] for respondents 3,6)

S. Alaguvel

Assistant Divisional Engineer, Highways Department (C & M), Tiruchendur; Divisional Engineer, Highways Department (C & M), Thoothukudi; Deputy Superintendent of Police, Tiruchendur Temple Police Station; Assistant Engineer, Highways Department (C & M), Tiruchendur; Assistant Electricity Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Udangudi; Inspector of Police, Kulasekaranpattinam Police Station; Tahsildar, Tiruchendur Taluk

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Certiorari to quash an order for demolition of compound wall.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of Order No. 06/2024 dated 31.12.2024 passed by the first respondent.

Filing Reason

Respondents were taking steps to demolish the petitioner's compound wall on the ground that it encroached upon land in S.No. 10/5A belonging to the Highways Department, without conducting a survey.

Issues

Whether the respondents can demolish the petitioner's compound wall without conducting a proper survey to determine encroachment.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the claim of encroachment is incorrect and that demolition is being sought without a survey. Respondents produced a letter dated 13.01.2025 instructing the Tahsildar to conduct a survey in the presence of the petitioner.

Ratio Decidendi

Before taking coercive action for removal of alleged encroachment, a proper survey must be conducted in the presence of the affected party to ascertain the facts.

Judgment Excerpts

In the light of these proceedings, we are of the view that the respondents may be directed to proceed with the survey in the presence of the petitioner herein and thereafter, take further course of action. Till such time the survey is conducted, no coercive action shall be taken for removal of the alleged encroachment.

Procedural History

The writ petition was filed on an unspecified date. By consent of both sides, it was taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission. The court heard the petitioner's counsel and the respondents' counsel, considered the letters produced, and disposed of the petition on 23.01.2025.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Directs Survey Before Demolition in Encroachment Dispute — No Coercive Action Till Survey Completed. Court orders proper survey of land in S.No. 10/5A in presence of petitioner before any demolition action under Article 226 of Con...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Appeal in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute — Upholds Single Judge's Refusal of Ad-Interim Relief. Court holds that a developer cannot claim exclusive right to implement a slum rehabilitation scheme when there is a...