WRIT PETITION (ST) NO. 1338 OF 2020
1 Jan 1970...
Search Results for "Concluded contract"
2758 result(s) found
Found 2758 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit Due to Buyer's Acceptance of Refund During Pendency. Acceptance of Refund of Earnest Money Indicates Lack of Readiness and Willingness, Making Suit Not Maintainable Under Specific Relief Act, 1963.
4 Apr 2025The dispute arose from a suit for specific performance of an Agreement to Sell dated 25th January 2008, executed between the buyer (Respondent No.1) a...
- 314
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Contractor's Appeal in Arbitration Case Upholding Contractual Interest Bar. Pendente Lite Interest Denied as Contract Clause Prohibiting Interest on 'Any Moneys Due' is Valid Under Section 31(7)(a) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and Does Not Violate Section 28 of Indian Contract Act, 1872.
4 Oct 2021The appeal arose from a dispute between a contractor and Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited regarding a construction contract for a boundary wall at a p...
- 247
High Court
Bombay High Court Partially Allows Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award in Commodity Trading Dispute — Holds That Arbitral Tribunal Erred in Rejecting Claim for Unauthorized Trades Without Considering Evidence of Unauthorized Transactions.
9 Jun 2015The petitioner, Mrs. Kaberi Mondal, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging portions of an arbitr...
- 105
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Government Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Voluntary Agreement Under Section 7(2) of Tamil Nadu Act Binds Parties, Cannot Seek Higher Compensation Under Section 12. The Court held that a party to a concluded statutory contract cannot take refuge under other provisions of the same Act to seek further relief.
30 Nov -0001The case involves appeals by the Government of Tamil Nadu against a judgment of the Madras High Court which allowed the respondents (landowners) to se...
- 201
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Domestic Bidder Challenging Contract Award to Foreign Company. Price Preference Claim Rejected for Non-Compliance with Bid Conditions.
19 Oct 2011The Petitioner, Punj Lloyd Ltd., a domestic company, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the award of a contract b...
- 92
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Written Contract in Municipal Theka Dispute Under U.P. Municipalities Act, 1916. Signed List of Bidders and Board Resolution Deemed Sufficient Written Agreement Under Section 97 of the Act.
20 Nov 1968The litigation arose from an auction conducted on April 8, 1950, by the Municipal Board, Saharanpur, for granting the theka (contract) to collect Tahb...
- 32
High Court
High Court of Gujarat Dismisses Petition for Appointment of Arbitrator in Coal Mining Services Agreement Dispute — No Arbitration Agreement Exists Between Petitioner and Respondent. Court holds that a consortium agreement does not create privity of contract between the lead member and the employer, and the arbitration clause in the draft CMSA cannot be invoked before execution of the main agreement.
30 Jan 2026The petitioner, Adani Enterprises Limited, filed a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of an ...
- 154
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Commercial Appeal Against Rejection of Interim Relief in Contract Dispute — Holds That Arbitrability of Disputes Does Not Bar Grant of Interim Measures Under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Court Remands Matter for Fresh Consideration on Merits, Emphasizing That Prima Facie Case, Balance of Convenience, and Irreparable Loss Must Be Examined.
8 Feb 2024The appellant, M/s. Ambarwadikar and Company, a registered partnership firm engaged in infrastructure business, filed a commercial appeal against a co...
- 44
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Concession Agreement for Non-Payment of Revenue Share. Court upholds termination as valid under Article 21.2 of the Concession Agreement for failure to pay monthly revenue share, rejecting claims of force majeure and breach of contract by the respondent.
20 Aug 2022The petitioners, MEP Infrastructure Developers Ltd., Ozoneland Private Limited, Mrs. Anuya J. Mhaiskar, and Mr. Manoj Upadhyay, filed a writ petition ...
- 38
