Search Results for "stay discretionary power"

641 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 641 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Decides Appeal Against Interim Injunction in Tenancy Possession Dispute; Considers Whether Temporary Restraint Order Was Justified

The case arose from a tenancy and possession dispute over Flat No.5, Second Floor, Goolestan, Cuffe Parade, Mumbai. The plaintiff, a senior citizen an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Tender Rejection for Non-Submission of 'Form B' Not Required by Tender Conditions. Court holds that rejection of bid was arbitrary and violative of Article 14, directing reconsideration of petitioner's bid.

The petitioner, M/s. Aditya Construction Company (J.V.), a joint venture partnership firm, challenged the rejection of its bid by the Vidarbha Irrigat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Prisoners' Furlough Petitions — Imposition of Condition to Stay Outside District Held Invalid Under Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959. Competent Authority Cannot Impose Condition Not Contemplated by Rules; Orders Rejecting Furlough Set Aside.

The judgment concerns two criminal writ petitions filed by prisoners challenging orders rejecting their applications for furlough. The petitioners, Ra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging SARFAESI Auction Sale Against Personal Guarantors. Alternative Remedy Under Section 17 of SARFAESI Act, 2002 Not Exhausted; Auction Sale Confirmed and Sale Certificate Issued.

The petitioners, M/s Utkarsh Cement Sales Pvt. Ltd. and its directors/guarantors, filed two writ petitions before the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Be...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Condemns Demolition by Municipal Corporation Under Guise of DCPR 2034 Redevelopment Scheme. Appeal from Order Dismisses Demolition as High-handed and Illegal Under Regulation 33(9) of Development Control and Promotion Regulation 2034.

The matter pertains to an appeal from order filed by M/s. Mehta & Co., a partnership firm through its partner Mr. Adarsh Varma, as original plaintiff,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision and Writ Petitions in Property Dispute, Upholding Appointment of Court Receiver. Court holds that disputes regarding title and possession cannot be decided in summary proceedings and that appointment of receiver is a discretionary remedy to preserve property.

The judgment arises from a property dispute concerning a piece of land in Mumbai. The original plaintiff, Amedmal Bhatewada (since deceased), filed a ...