Search Results for "residuary provision"

448 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 448 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines MCD's Recovery Notices Against MEPIDL for Territorial Overreach. Cross-Petitions on Attachment of Assets Outside Delhi Under DMC Act, 1957.

The dispute arose from a contract dated 28th September 2017 between MEP Infrastructure Developers Limited (MEPIDL), a Mumbai-based enterprise, and the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Trial Court's Order on Court-Fees Valuation in Suit for Registration under Section 77 of Registration Act. Suit for Enforcement of Statutory Obligation Not Susceptible of Monetary Valuation, Governed by Section 6(iv)(j) of Bombay Court-fees Act, 1958, Not Section 6(xi).

The petitioners, as plaintiffs, filed a suit in the Court of Civil Judge, Junior Division, Pune under Section 77 of the Registration Act, 1908, seekin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to Maharashtra Excise Notifications Discriminating Against Imported Wines. Petitioner contends that the impugned notifications violate GATT national treatment principle and constitutional rights under Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 253.

The writ petition before the Bombay High Court involved a challenge by an importer of foreign wines, holding an FL-I licence, to several notifications...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Guarantors in Bank Fraud Case Due to Settlement — Wives of Main Accused with No Active Role Entitled to Relief. Settlement of Civil Dues and Lack of Specific Role Justify Quashing of Charges Under Section 482 CrPC.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by K. Bharthi Devi and another (Accused Nos. 3 and 4) against the judgment of the High Court of Judicature ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Partition Suit, Upholds Concurrent Findings on Void Gift Deed and Limitation. The court held that no substantial question of law arose regarding limitation under Article 58 of the Limitation Act, 1963, as the courts below had concurrently found the suit not barred.

The case involves a partition suit filed by K.C. Chandrappa Gowda (plaintiff) against his father K.S. Chinne Gowda (first defendant) and K.C. Laxmana ...