Search Results for "residency"

623 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 623 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Husband and In-Laws in Dowry Harassment Case Due to Vague Allegations. General and Omnibus Allegations Without Specific Instances of Cruelty or Dowry Demand Do Not Attract Section 498-A IPC.

The applicants, who are the husband (applicant no.1), mother-in-law (applicant no.2, aged 74 and bedridden), and two brothers-in-law (applicants 3 and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal of Interim Injunction in Trust Property Dispute. Appellants failed to establish prima facie case and balance of convenience for injunction regarding trust property.

The appellants, who were plaintiffs in Special Civil Suit No.153 of 2008 before the 4th Joint Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.), Amravati, filed an appeal against ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Notice of Motion in Trademark Infringement Suit Due to Delay and Lack of Urgency. Plaintiffs' claim for interim injunction rejected as they failed to establish prima facie case and balance of convenience.

The plaintiffs, Lokhandwala Construction Industries Pvt. Ltd. and Lokhandwala Builders Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR and Charge Sheet in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Criminal Intent. Allegation of Cheating and Dishonour of Cheque Under Sections 138, 141 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and Sections 406, 420 IPC Fails as Dispute is Purely Civil in Nature.

The petitioners, original accused nos. 1 to 3, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quashing of the FIR and charg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Sanction Under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The court held that mandatory sanction for prosecution of public servants was not obtained, rendering the entire proceedings unsustainable.

The applicants, Ravindra Babulal Jain and Ashish Tejmal Mugdiya, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 197...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Private Individuals in Corruption Case for Lack of Sanction Under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. FIR Quashed as No Sanction Obtained for Prosecution of Public Servants, Making Proceedings Against Applicants for Conspiracy Not Maintainable.

The applicants, Ravindra Babulal Jain and Ashish Tejmal Mugdiya, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 197...