Search Results for "reasonable person test"

4252 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4252 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Appellant in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 6 of POCSO Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Sexual Assault Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, P. Yuvaprakash, was convicted by the trial court and the Madras High Court for offenses under Section 366A IPC and Section 6 of the POC...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Full Bench Considers Validity of Rule Excluding Full-Time Salaried Assistant Public Prosecutors from District Judge Appointments. The case concerns interpretation of 'advocate' under Article 233(2) of the Constitution and consistency with Supreme Court precedent.

The Full Bench of the Bombay High Court heard a reference arising from a writ petition filed by six Assistant Public Prosecutors employed on a full-ti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Issues Rule Nisi in Cyber Fraud Case Involving Unauthorized Withdrawals of Rs. 38.04 Lakh. Petitioner Claims Banks Breached RBI Guidelines on Internet Banking and Failed to Reverse Fraudulent Transactions.

The petitioner, a freelancer in business consultancy, maintained savings and current accounts with HDFC Bank since 2011 and 2016 respectively. On 14 J...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considered Constitutional Challenge to Maharashtra Land Acquisition Amendment for Bullet Train Project. Petition Raised Questions of Repugnancy Under Article 254, Presidential Assent, Natural Justice, and Scope of Section 33 of the Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013.

The litigation concerned a challenge to land acquisition for the Mumbai-Ahmedabad High Speed Rail project, commonly called the Bullet Train Project. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Confirms Death Sentence for Accused in Triple Murder Case — Circumstantial Evidence and Motive Establish Guilt. Accused Raju Birha Convicted Under Section 302 IPC for Murder of Three Persons, Death Penalty Upheld as Rarest of Rare Case.

The case pertains to the conviction of Raju Birha for the murder of three persons, Sunil Kotangale, Kailash Bahadure, and Golu @ Ashish Gaikwad, under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 5290 OF 2013

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Favor of Plaintiff in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit. Registered Trademark 'SACU-V' for Heart Failure Drug Protected Against Deceptively Similar Mark 'SACV' for Same Composition Pharmaceutical Product.

The Plaintiff, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd., is engaged in manufacturing and sale of pharmaceutical preparations. It adopted the trademark 'SACU-V' i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Reconsiders Appellant’s Murder Conviction Based on Circumstantial Evidence; Handwriting Expert Opinion Under Scrutiny. Conviction of Appellant for Murder Under Section 302 IPC Challenged on Grounds That Chain of Circumstances Incomplete and Expert Evidence Not Corroborated.

The appellant, Vikas Ramdas Khairnar Patil, preferred a criminal appeal before the Bombay High Court against his conviction and life imprisonment for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Considers Challenge to Levy of VAT on Liquor by Certain Licensees; Alleged Discrimination Between Different Categories of Excise Licence Holders. Petitioners Contend That Notification Exempting Some Dealers While Taxing Others Violates Articles 14, 19, and 304B of the Constitution.

The writ petitions were filed by various licensees under the Karnataka Excise Act, 1967, challenging the constitutional validity of Entry No.59A of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Validity of Consumer Protection Appointment Rules; Selection Committee Procedure Under Scrutiny. Court Considers Whether Rules Violate Article 14 and Supreme Court Directions in State of UP v. UP Consumer Protection Bar Association.

These two petitions challenged the Consumer Protection (Qualification for appointment, method of recruitment, procedure of appointment, term of office...