Search Results for "rape charges"

552 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 552 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Rape and Robbery in Case of False Promise of Marriage. Court holds that sexual intercourse on false promise of marriage constitutes rape under Section 375 IPC and that theft during such act amounts to robbery under Section 390 IPC.

The case involves two appeals: Criminal Appeal No. 467 of 2012 filed by the convict Anand Singh challenging his conviction and sentence, and Criminal ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Convict in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Medical Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(i) IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act set aside as victim's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support penetration.

The appellant, Siddharth @ Bollywood S/o Bapurao Meshram, was convicted by the Special Judge, Wardha for offences under Section 376(2)(i) and Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony of Prosecutrix and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(i)(n) IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act set aside as evidence of victim was unreliable and medical evidence did not support prosecution case.

The appellant, Mr. Sayyad Chand Agasapure, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur, for offences under Section 376(2)(i)(n) of the Ind...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Dying Declarations and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 302, 323, 494 read with Section 34 IPC set aside as dying declarations were inconsistent and not corroborated by medical evidence.

The appellants, Shobha Jahangir Shinde and Jahangir Srirang Shinde, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur, for offences under Secti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Gang Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Delayed FIR. Conviction under Section 376(2)(g) IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Rajendra Nivrutti Butte and Ashok Tukaram Butte (respondents) for offences under Section 37...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in SC/ST Atrocity Case Due to Lack of Caste-Based Intent and Allows Compounding of IPC Offences. Conviction under Section 3(1)(xi) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 set aside as no evidence that offence was committed on account of victim's caste.

The appellant, Mansingh Baburao Garud, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge for offences under Sections 354, 451, 509 of the Indian Penal Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Extortion Case Due to Settlement Between Parties. Offences Under Sections 386, 387, 447, 506, 109 IPC Are Compoundable or Non-Serious, and Continuation Would Be Futile.

The applicants (accused) filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of RCC No.3212 of 2015 arisi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 5(j)(ii) and (l) r/w 6 of POCSO Act and Section 376(2)(j)(n) IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Abdul Riyaz @ Riyaz Pasha, was convicted by the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Chamarajanagar, in Special Case No.80/2014 for o...