Search Results for "property title"

5809 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5809 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 5539 OF 2017

The petitioner, M/s. Veekaylal Investment Co. Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India in the Bombay High Court...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Conversion of Occupancy Class-II to Class-I Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 — Holds That Section 44 of the Code Does Not Bar Such Conversion for Lands Acquired Under Part VII of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The petitioner, Ananta Landmarks Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order/communicat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Registration Act Case — Compromise Decree Not Requiring Registration. Compromise decree relating to suit property does not require registration under Section 17(2)(vi) of Registration Act, 1908.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Indore Bench dated 13.02.2017, which dismissed the appellants' writ petition c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Sets Aside Concurrent Findings on Limitation and Validity of Sale Deed. Suit for Possession Based on Prior Agreement to Sell Held Not Barred by Limitation as Cause of Action Arose from Notice of Eviction, Not Registration of Sale Deed.

The case involves a property dispute where the original plaintiff (now represented by legal heirs) filed a suit for possession based on an agreement t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Competent Authority Order in MOFA Dispute — Failure to Provide Hearing Violates Natural Justice. Section 5A of MOFA Requires Notice and Opportunity of Hearing Before Directing Conveyance of Land to Society.

The petitioners, Mazda Construction Company, Maredia Enterprises, and Sultanabad CHS Ltd. (Proposed), challenged an order dated 11.04.2012 passed by t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Ownership Dispute — Fails to Prove Sole Ownership and Adverse Possession. Court upholds trial court's finding that appellant failed to establish exclusive title and that suit was barred by limitation under Article 65 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The case involves a property dispute between the appellant, Namdeo Gangaram Mandalkar (since deceased, represented by his heirs), and the respondent, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Upholding Concurrent Findings on Ownership and Possession. Counterclaim for Ownership Based on Adverse Possession Fails as Appellants Failed to Prove Hostile Possession and Ouster of True Owners.

The case involves a property dispute between two sets of parties over a house and land in Bicholim, Goa. The respondents/plaintiffs (Shaikh Mohammad A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed. Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Injunction Dismissed as Barred by Limitation and Failure to Prove Possession.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original plaintiffs (appellants) against the judgment and decree of the District Court, which affirmed ...