Search Results for "ownership period"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "ownership period"

3101 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3101 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal by State Authorities in Mandatory Injunction Suit — Upholds Trial Court Decree Directing Removal of Encroachment on Public Road. Suit for mandatory injunction and permanent injunction decreed as plaintiff established that defendants had encroached upon a public road by constructing a compound wall, causing obstruction to access.

24 Sep 2025

The Regular First Appeal was filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, by the defendants (appellants) challenging the judgment and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Upholds Plaintiff's Prescriptive Title in Property Dispute — Continuous Possession for Over 30 Years Establishes Ownership Under Limitation Act, 1963. Adverse Possession Claim Succeeds as Defendants Fail to Prove Their Ownership or Possession of Survey No.85/1.

31 Mar 2005

The dispute concerns a property admeasuring about 6225 sq. metres, surveyed under No.85/1 as 'Shristhal' in Poinguinim village, Canacona Taluka, Goa. ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Suit — Finds Substantial Question of Law on Adverse Possession and Co-owner's Possession. Court holds that possession of one co-owner is possession of all co-owners unless there is ouster, and that the trial court's finding of adverse possession was perverse.

29 Nov 2013

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original defendants against the judgment and decree dated 24.07.2012 passed by the learned District Jud...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging MRT Order in Tenancy Matter — Purchase Certificate Under Section 32M Upheld Despite Delay in Section 32F Application. The court held that the application under Section 32F of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 was barred by limitation as it was filed beyond two years from the landlord's death, and the purchase certificate under Section 32M is conclusive.

22 Jan 2015

The petitioners, claiming to be tenants of a suit property, initiated proceedings under Section 32G of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, ...

Supreme Court

“Mandatory Injunction vs Possession: Supreme Court Clarifies Section 41(h) Specific Relief Act (2026 INSC 61)”“Cloud on Title & Possession: Why Injunction Suit Fails

15 Jan 2026

In Sanjay Paliwal v. Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd., the plaintiffs sought a mandatory injunction to remove a wall allegedly blocking access to their l...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Petition of Person with Disability Seeking Tax Exemption for Vehicle. Court holds that no statutory provision under Tamil Nadu Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1974 or Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 grants exemption from road tax to persons with disabilities, and a recommendation by the Commission for Persons with Disability is not binding.

27 Jan 2025

The petitioner, A.Shanthi, a person with 60% locomotor disability, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Mad...

High Court

Bombay High Court Commercial Division Considers Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award Imposing Liability on Depository for Broker's Actions. The petition challenges the award's finding that CDSL must indemnify investor for breach by its depository participant despite the broker's misuse of power of attorney.

1 Dec 2025

Background: The petition pertains to a challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against an arbitral award that held th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Batch of Petitions by Retailers and Others Challenging Service Tax on Renting of Immovable Property. The levy of service tax on renting was contested under the Finance Act, 1994, Sections 65–66, on constitutional grounds.

4 Aug 2011

The judgment, delivered orally on August 4, 2011, by a Division Bench of the Bombay High Court comprising Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud and Anoop V. Mohta, JJ....

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses State's Appeal in Temple Land Dispute, Upholds Deity's Ownership and Procedural Violation in Revenue Correction. The Court held that correction of revenue entries without following Section 115 of the Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959 is unsustainable, and the Deity can maintain a suit through Pujaris.

25 Oct 2019

The State of Madhya Pradesh and others appealed against the dismissal of their second appeal by the High Court, which had affirmed the decree of the F...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Condominium Association for Lack of Locus Standi Under Consumer Protection Act. Statutory Body Formed Under Karnataka Apartment Ownership Act, 1972 Is Not a Voluntary Consumer Association or Consumer Under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

14 Feb 2020

The appellant, Sobha Hibiscus Condominium, is a statutory body formed under the Karnataka Apartment Ownership Act, 1972, comprising owners of apartmen...

35 36 37 38 39

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)