Search Results for "notice under Section 25(3)"

465 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 465 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Considers Tax Revision Against Tribunal Order Restoring Equal Addition and Penalty Under TNVAT Act, 2006. Taxpayer Argues Stock Variation Computed from Notional Trading Method Without Physical Verification Cannot Sustain Penalty Under Section 27(3)(c).

The case involved a tax revision petition filed by M/s. Vista Garments, a registered dealer under the CGST Act, 2017, engaged in manufacturing hosiery...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Resettlement Project Due to Unexplained Delay of 12 Years. Petitioners' challenge to 2006 order of Divisional Commissioner fails as they failed to demonstrate diligence after personal hearing in 2005.

The petitioners, four individuals who are grandchildren of the original landowner Babasaheb Khadirsaheb Pirjade, filed a writ petition in 2018 challen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Partition Suit Due to Non-Service of Summons on Defendants, Remands Matter for Fresh Trial. Ex-parte decree set aside as trial court failed to ensure proper service, violating principles of natural justice under Section 96 CPC.

The appellants, who were defendants 1 to 6 in the original suit, filed this appeal under Section 96 read with Order 41 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Pro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation for POCSO Victim Under NALSA Scheme — Inadequate Compensation of Rs. 1,00,000 Enhanced to Rs. 10,50,000. The court held that the NALSA Scheme mandates minimum compensation of Rs. 7,00,000 for sexual assault victims, which can be enhanced by 50%.

The appellant, Smt. Lalitha, mother of a minor victim of sexual assault, filed an appeal under Section 372 CrPC challenging the adequacy of compensati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal for Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction in Income Tax Matter. Jurisdiction lies with High Court where Assessing Officer is located, not where ITAT Bench sits.

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Panaji Bench, which had ru...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Acquitted Accused Pending Appeal Against Acquittal Under Section 390 CrPC. The court held that the applicant is entitled to bail as a matter of right in view of the decision in State of Maharashtra v. Bapu Pandu Mali, and granted bail subject to conditions.

The applicant, Balkrishna Mahadev Lad, was the original accused in Sessions Case No.276 of 2010 arising from C.R.No.26 of 2010 registered at Gamdevi P...