Search Results for "metropolitan area"

720 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 720 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Pronounces on MSEDCL's Challenge to Order Permitting Single Point Supply to Condominium Under Section 127 Electricity Act. Appellate Authority Allowed Developer to Supply Electricity to Unit Holders through HT Connection Without Individual Connections.

The dispute pertains to the legality of single point electricity supply to a condominium complex known as Great Eastern Plaza in Pune. The petitioner,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Tenders for Take Home Ration and Hot Cooked Meal Programs. Court finds no violation of Supreme Court directions as impugned tenders were not issued by State Government but by Municipal Corporation.

The petitioner, Mumbai V. Konkan Vibhagiya Mahila Aydyogik Utpadak Sahakari Sanstha Mahasangh Ltd., a federation of women self-help groups registered ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Three Accused in Dacoity with Murder Case — Life Imprisonment Confirmed for Dacoity Under Section 396 IPC. Conviction Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Recovery of Stolen Property Under Section 412 IPC.

The case involves four criminal appeals filed under Section 374 of the Criminal Procedure Code against a common judgment and order of conviction and s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Invalidation of Scheduled Tribe Certificate for Migrant from Gujarat. Dhodia Tribe Recognized in Both States; Migration Does Not Disentitle Benefits in Maharashtra.

The Petitioner, Bankimchandra Makanbhai Patel, claimed to belong to the Dhodia tribe, which is recognized as a Scheduled Tribe under Article 342(1) of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Heritage Committee's Approval for Demolition of Heritage Building. Court holds that the Heritage Committee's decision is final and binding, and the petitioners failed to demonstrate any illegality or arbitrariness in the approval process.

The petitioners, Prakash V. Patel and Dilnar Jehanbux Chichgar, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Bombay High Court challenging the ...