Bombay High Court Delivers Judgment on Interim Applications in Property Suits Regarding Appointment of Court Receiver. The Heirs of Sole Proprietor Seek Relief Against Multiple Defendants Including Developers and Property Owners.
3 Nov 2025...
Search Results for "landlord‑tenant relationship"
566 result(s) found
Found 566 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Eviction Decree in License Dispute — Constituted Attorney's Lack of Personal Knowledge Does Not Invalidate Suit When Plaintiff's Ownership is Undisputed and Defendant Fails to Prove Tenancy.
12 Mar 2024The dispute pertains to Room No.2 (2-A) admeasuring 290 sq.ft on CTS No. 185 situated at 1st Floor, Kumud Villa, 321, Vithalbhai Patel Road, Paper Mil...
- 39
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits — Concurrent Findings Set Aside Due to Non-Compliance with Order 41 Rule 31 CPC. First Appellate Court's Failure to Frame Points for Determination and Provide Reasoning Renders Judgment Unsustainable.
8 Nov 2023The case involves a second appeal filed by the original defendants against the judgment and decree passed by the District Judge, Beed, in Regular Civi...
- 70
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Landlord's Appeal in Permanent Injunction Suit — Tenant Fails to Prove Actual Possession Under Section 38 of Specific Relief Act, 1963. The Court held that possession cannot be inferred from circumstances and absence of business licences and electricity connection negates claim of possession.
6 Feb 2019The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the appellant-landlord against the judgment of the Bombay High Court which had affirmed the First Appell...
- 435
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Return of Plaint in Brother vs. Brother Eviction Suit — Civil Court Has Jurisdiction Over Property Disputes Between Co-Owners/Legal Heirs Without Landlord-Tenant Relationship. The court held that the term 'licensee' under Section 41 of the Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882 does not extend to disputes between family members in possession of ancestral property, and the Civil Court has jurisdiction.
15 Oct 2013The appellant, Manohar Sahadev Shinde, filed a suit in the City Civil Court, Mumbai, seeking eviction of his brother, Yashwant Sahadev Shinde, from a ...
- 140
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Lease Dispute — Upholds Award Allowing Landlord's Counterclaim for Outgoings. Arbitrator's interpretation of lease deed regarding payment of outgoings by tenant held plausible and not perverse under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
10 Jun 2013The Petitioner, Home Care Retail Marts Pvt. Ltd., challenged an arbitral award dated 4 February 2010 passed by a sole Arbitrator under Section 34 of t...
- 171
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Tenant's Petition in Bombay Tenancy Act Case — Certificate of Purchase Under Section 32M Cannot Be Challenged After 9 Years. The Court Held That the Certificate Is Conclusive and the Landlord Cannot Seek Termination of Tenancy After the Tenant Has Purchased the Land.
10 Jan 2012The case involves a dispute under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act, 1948 regarding agricultural land bearing Gat No. 98 in village Tilleha...
- 108
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit, Sets Aside Decree for Possession Due to Non-Compliance with Order 2 Rule 2 CPC. Plaintiffs Failed to Disclose Earlier Agreement for Sale, Barring Subsequent Suit for Specific Performance.
24 Jun 2010The appellants, original defendants, challenged the judgment and decree dated 14th October 2008 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Ka...
- 78
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Occupier in Company Liquidation - Licence Created After Winding Up Petition is Void. Official Liquidator Entitled to Recover Possession from Trespasser Despite Deemed Tenancy Decree.
29 Sep 2005The appeal arises from an order of a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court in a company application filed by Respondent No.3 (original applicant) agai...
- 127
