High Court of Judicature at Bombay Nagpur Bench Decides Multiple Letters Patent Appeals. The Decision Involves First Appeals and Related Disputes.
1 Jan 1970...
Search Results for "land title dispute"
3516 result(s) found
Found 3516 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Shamlat Deh Land Dispute — Amendment Protection Not Available Without Proof of Allotment to Displaced Person. Land recorded as Shamlat deh in revenue records cannot be excluded from definition under Section 2(g) of Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961 unless allotment on quasi-permanent basis to displaced person or transfer by sale before 09.07.1985 is established.
10 Jan 2025The Supreme Court dismissed a batch of Special Leave Petitions challenging orders of eviction from lands claimed to be Shamlat deh under the Punjab Vi...
- 638
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Injunction Suit — Concurrent Findings of Possession and Title Upheld. The court held that the appellants failed to prove their title and possession over the suit property, and the concurrent findings of the courts below did not suffer from any perversity or substantial question of law.
12 Mar 2021The case pertains to a suit for permanent injunction filed by the respondents (original plaintiffs) against the appellants (original defendants) in re...
- 53
High Court
Bombay High Court at Goa Allows Claimants' Appeal in Land Acquisition Case for Salaulim Irrigation Project — Market Value Enhanced to Rs. 100 per sq.m. Based on Comparable Sale Deed. The court held that the Reference Court erred in not properly considering a sale deed of a nearby plot at Rs. 150 per sq.m. and that the land had potential for development, warranting a higher compensation.
26 Nov 2010The case involves two cross-appeals arising from a land acquisition proceeding under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The land in question, measuring 1...
- 95
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Housing Society in Property Dispute Over Water Connection and Construction. Developer's Agreement to Provide Water Connection and Restrict Construction Held Binding.
16 Mar 2006The case involves two cross-appeals arising from a judgment and decree dated 31st March 2004 in L.C. Suit No. 786 of 2004. The appellants in First App...
- 120
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against BMC Dispensary Construction on Municipal Land — No Prima Facie Title or Possession Established by Plaintiff. Suit property claimed by plaintiff was part of a larger municipal plot; plaintiff failed to show exclusive title or possession, and BMC's construction for public dispensary was held to be in public interest.
3 Oct 2023The appellant, Dhanista Builders and Developers, a proprietary firm of Devdas Bhujang Rao, filed an appeal against an order of the City Civil Court, G...
- 44
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Mutation Entry in Revenue Records — Dispute Over Agricultural Land Inheritance and Partition. Court Held That Mutation Entries Do Not Confer Title and Remedy Lies Before Civil Court.
19 Dec 2023The petitioners, eleven individuals from the Jarande family, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging a mutation entry (Entry No...
- 38
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Land Title Dispute — Concurrent Findings Upheld. Patta Validity Requires Proof of Abandonment or Revocation of Earlier Patta Under Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code.
9 Apr 2019The Supreme Court dismissed an appeal arising from a land title dispute in Madhya Pradesh. The respondents-plaintiffs (Shiv Nath and deceased Vishwana...
- 270
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Decree of Possession and Mesne Profits to Purchasers in Suit for Ejectment of Trespassers Based on Title. Unregistered Agreement for Sale Does Not Confer Title or Right to Possession Without Payment of Consideration.
28 Jul 2016The plaintiffs, Sharad Shantilal Chheda and Taruna Anil Chheda, filed a suit in the Bombay High Court seeking a decree of possession and mesne profits...
- 164
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Construction Dispute — Award Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice and Non-Consideration of Evidence. The court held that denial of cross-examination and failure to consider electronic evidence under Section 65B of the Evidence Act, 1872, renders an arbitral award patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
29 Apr 2016The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, against an arbitral award passed by a sole arbitrator. The...
- 263
