Search Results for "hostile panch witness"

1333 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1333 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Six Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sections 42 and 50. Failure to Record Reasons for Search and Lack of Independent Witnesses Renders Recovery of Contraband Illegal.

The case involves six appellants who were convicted by the trial court under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) for p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Education Officer in Bribery Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Contradictory Evidence. Conviction under Section 161 IPC and Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Demand and Acceptance Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Harishchandra Prabhakar Borkar, was the Education Officer of Zilla Parishad, Nagpur. He was convicted by the Special Judge, Nagpur, in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Ravi alias Battery Ravi, was convicted by the Fast Track Court, Hunsur, in S.C. No. 248 of 2011 for the murder of his son Nishor under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Reviews Death Sentence Reference in Gang Rape and Murder Case. Conviction Based on Circumstantial Evidence of Last Seen Together and Forcible Abduction from House of Victim's Uncle.

The matter arises from a reference made by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur, under Section 366 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, for confi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Attempt to Dispose of Body in Domestic Violence Case — Circumstantial Evidence Sufficient to Prove Guilt. Extra-judicial confession and last seen theory established the appellant's guilt under Section 302 IPC and Section 201 r/w 511 IPC.

The appellant, Pundlik Basu Chavan, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Gadhinglaj, for the murder of his wife under Section 302 IPC and f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and acceptance of bribe not proved beyond reasonable doubt under Sections 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Gujarat appealed against the acquittal of Jethabhai Manjibhai Hadiyal, a Talati-cum-Mantri, from charges under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 42(2) of NDPS Act. Secret Information Not Sent to Superior Officer Renders Search Illegal and Conviction Unsustainable.

The appellant, Majjidkha s/o Hanifkha Khan, was convicted by the Special Judge, Chandrapur in Special Case No.10/2004 for an offence punishable under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Ashwin Chintaman Shambharkar, was convicted by the Special Judge, Nagpur in Special Case No. 18 of 1997 for offences under Section 7 an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Criminal Appeal No. 57 of 2011

The appeal arose from the conviction of the appellant, Shailendrakumar Satyanarayan Thakur, by the Additional Sessions Judge, Vasai, on 25th October 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Appeal Against Murder Conviction Under Section 302 IPC in Light of Procedural Lapses and Contradictory Eyewitness Accounts

The appeals arose from Sessions Case No. 63/2000 where accused nos.1 to 3 were convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Co...