Search Results for "fraud/misrepresentation"

948 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 948 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Against Defendant in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit — Use of 'KATARIA INSURANCE' Held Deceptively Similar to Plaintiff's Registered Marks 'KATARIA' and 'KATARIA INSURANCE CONSULTANCY' Under Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The plaintiff, Bhavesh Suresh Kataria, proprietor of Kataria Jewellery Insurance Consultancy, filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Partly Allows Writ Petition Against Recovery of Excess Pay from Steno-Typist. Recovery Set Aside on Grounds of Hardship as Employee Belonged to Group C Service, Excess Payment Exceeded Five Years, and No Misrepresentation Found, Following State of Punjab v. Rafiq Masih.

The dispute arose when the petitioner, K. Amutha, a Steno-Typist serving in the judicial department of the State of Tamil Nadu, was confronted with a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Hears Defendant's Appeal Against Specific Performance Decree. Trial Court Directs Execution of Sale Deed for Agricultural Land After Finding Valid Agreement of Sale.

The litigation arose from a suit for specific performance of an agreement of sale pertaining to agricultural land measuring 11 acres 21 guntas situate...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appellant in SEBI PFUTP Regulations Case Due to Non-Disclosure of Investigation Report. The Court Held That the Investigation Report Under Regulation 9 Must Be Disclosed to Ensure a Fair Hearing Under Principles of Natural Justice, as It Forms the Basis for the Show Cause Notice.

The dispute arose from a show cause notice issued by SEBI to the appellant, alleging violations of the SEBI (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trad...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Compulsory Retirement Order Due to Delay and Laches. Petitioner's challenge to a 1986 compulsory retirement order dismissed as the dispute was settled by compromise and the writ petition filed in 2014 was grossly delayed.

The petitioner, S. Rudrappa, a retired cashier of The Mysore Merchants Co-op. Society Ltd., was compulsorily retired on 16.09.1986. He challenged the ...