Search Results for "distributed"

1036 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1036 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds State Government Order Allowing Direct Electricity Supply to Consumer in Public Interest. Order Under Section 3(2)(e)(ii) of Indian Electricity Act, 1910 as Amended by U.P. Act 30 of 1961 Does Not Violate Articles 14 and 31 of Constitution.

The Western U.P. Electric Power & Supply Company Ltd., a licensee under the Indian Electricity Act, 1910, supplied electricity in certain areas of Utt...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Madras High Court Decision on Validity of Security Bond and Priority in Rateable Distribution. Charge Created by Security Bond Held Valid Despite Lack of Attestation; Decree Holder Entitled to Priority Under Section 73(1) Proviso (c) Code of Civil Procedure.

The appellant (M. L. Abdul Jabhar Sahib) instituted C.S. No. 56 of 1953 on the Original Side of the Madras High Court against Hajee Ahmed Batcha for r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Case involving the sexual exploitation of six minor girls by a tantric/baba: Re-imposing a Sentence of Imprisonment for Life: Upholding Justice for Multiple Sexual Assaults on Minors. Ensuring justice is served for the heinous acts committed, a life sentence is deemed appropriate in this case.

Case involving the sexual exploitation of six minor girls by a tantric/baba who had promised to cure their mothers' daughters of a defect that would r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Permanent Status for Tamil Nadu Medical Services Corporation Workmen. TNMSC Employees Secured Their Rights Under the Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishments Act, 1981, After a Protracted Legal Battle

The Court has addressed cross appeals involving the Tamil Nadu Medical Services Corporation Limited (TNMSC) and its employees' union regarding the app...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Reverses Railway Claims Tribunal Decision, Awards Rs. 8 Lakhs in Compensation for Untoward Incident. The appellant, mistakenly boarding the wrong train and sustaining injuries, was deemed a bona fide passenger eligible for compensation under the Railways Act, 1989.

This appeal, filed under Section 23 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987, challenges the judgment of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur Bench, wh...