Search Results for "dangerous activities"

759 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 759 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not justify preventive detention.

The petitioner, Kamleshkumar @ Kamleshbhai Ramdev Ray, was preventively detained by the Commissioner of Police, Surat City, under the Gujarat Preventi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not justify preventive detention.

The petitioner, Mohammadanawaz @ Salman Mohsmmadyusuf Shekh, through his mother Shekh Kamrunisha Mohammadyusuf, challenged the legality and validity o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not justify preventive detention.

The petitioner, Mohammadkaif @ Aman Abdul Razak Pathan, through his father Abdul Razak Yakubbhai Pathan, challenged the legality and validity of a pre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not justify preventive detention.

The petitioner, Parvejkhan @ Raja Mustakkhan Pathan, was preventively detained by an order dated 25.12.2025 passed by the Police Commissioner, Ahmedab...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not justify preventive detention without evidence of impact on public order.

The petitioner, Arjun S/o Ganeshbhai Yadav, was preventively detained by the Commissioner of Police, Surat City, vide order dated 22.12.2025, under th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not justify preventive detention.

The petitioner, Somesh @ Sonu S/o Shyamchand Chandubhai Pujari, was preventively detained by the District Magistrate & Collectorate, Gandhinagar, vide...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not justify preventive detention.

The petitioner, Gautambhai @Gogo Dharambhai Baraiya, was preventively detained by an order dated 15.12.2025 passed by the Police Commissioner, Rajkot ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not justify preventive detention.

The petitioner, Raja Ashoklal Kevlani, was preventively detained by an order dated 12.12.2025 passed by the Police Commissioner, Ahmedabad City, under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Unexplained Delay. Preventive detention order set aside as 7 months and 8 days delay between crimes and detention order was not satisfactorily explained, violating constitutional safeguards.

The petitioner, Kiran Ramjan Machare, challenged a detention order dated 5 September 2023 issued by the Commissioner of Police, Pimpari-Chinchwad, Pun...