Search Results for "balance of convenience"

588 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 588 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Grants Interim Injunction Against Defamatory Social Media Posts in Personality Rights Case. Court restrains respondent from publishing defamatory content about applicant's character and professional reputation pending trial.

The applicant, T. Rangaraj, filed a suit seeking permanent injunction and other reliefs against the respondent, Ms. Joy Crizildaa, and John Doe/s, all...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Injunction Restraining Defendants from Preventing Plaintiff's Possession of Suit Flat in Property Dispute Between Sisters. Court Rejects Plaintiff's Claim for Temporary Partition Wall, Holding That No Right to Create New Structure Exists Under Gift Deed or Law.

The case involves a dispute between two sisters over two adjoining flats originally owned by their father, Jagat Bhushan Jain. The father executed gif...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit Over 'SUKOON OIL' Label — Appellant's Use of 'SUKOON' Label Held Deceptively Similar to Respondent's Registered Trademark.

The respondent-plaintiff, Shafeeque Ahmed Mohammed Sayeed, trading as M/s. Nageena Ayurvedic Pharmacy, filed a suit for infringement of registered tra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Injunction Order in Property Dispute Between Brothers. Court upholds trial court's discretion in granting temporary injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC, finding no perversity or jurisdictional error.

The petitioners, original defendants in a civil suit, challenged the order dated 2nd May 2017 passed by the District Judge-2, Niphad, dismissing their...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Application in Suit for Permanent Injunction — Dispute Over Property Rights and Possession. Court Holds That Trial Court Erred in Dismissing Application Under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC Without Proper Application of Mind and Without Considering Prima Facie Case.

The revision application was filed by the applicants (original plaintiffs) challenging the order dated 23.11.2017 passed by the trial court dismissing...