Search Results for "axe injury"

434 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 434 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Revision Application and Quashes Conviction Under Sections 323, 324, 325, 326 IPC Based on Compromise Between Parties. The court held that even non-compoundable offences can be quashed in the interest of justice when parties have genuinely settled and injured witnesses consent.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by Thakor Arjanji Sardarji (since abated) and others against the State of Gujarat. The applica...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Hears Appeal Against Conviction in Murder Conspiracy Case. Trial Court Convicted Accused for Murder of Sitting MLA Under Sections 302, 307, 120B IPC, but Accused Challenges Validity of Trial Based on Illegal Charge Sheet and Manipulated Evidence.

The accused No.6 (appellant) appealed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence passed by the I Additional District and Sessions Judge,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Murder Case Based on Voluntary Extra-Judicial Confession. Extra-Judicial Confession Made to Relatives and Landlord Found Reliable and Corroborated by Medical Evidence and Circumstances, Affirming Conviction Under Section 302 IPC.

The appeal arose from a conviction under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code by the Ad-hoc Additional District and Sessions Judge, Thane, sentencing ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Doubtful Testimony and Parity with Acquitted Co-Accused. Conviction under Section 302 IPC read with Section 149 IPC set aside as evidence of interested witnesses was inconsistent and omnibus.

The case arises from an incident where the complainant Jagannath (P.W.1) and his wife Kamlabai (P.W.8) along with their son deceased Laxminarayan and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and House Trespass in Brother-in-Law Killing Case. Circumstantial Evidence Including Motive, Last Seen, and Recovery of Weapon Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Sections 449 and 302 IPC.

The appellant, Laxman Pandurang Pawar, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Yavatmal, for offences punishable under Sections 449 (house-trespass in or...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Links. Conviction under Sections 302, 201, 404 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Kalekha Lalkha Pathan, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Bhokar, District-Nanded on 9th October 2018 for offences under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Confirms Life Imprisonment for Murder Conviction Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Motive. Appellant's conviction under Section 302 IPC upheld as chain of circumstances including last seen evidence, motive, and recovery of weapon was complete and consistent with guilt.

The appellant, Rajendra Sarwade, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of his wife Chhaya. The prosecution case was that the appellant su...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Failure to Prove Motive. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt based on circumstantial evidence and unreliable witnesses.

The appellant, Anil Shrawan More, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule, for the murder of his wife under Section 302 of the Indian Pe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Eyewitness Accounts and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Popat @ Bhujangrao Bhausaheb Mahurkar, Sou. Vandana Popat Mahurkar, and Kum. Meena Bhausaheb Mahurkar, were convicted by the V Ad-hoc ...