Search Results for "area restriction removal"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "area restriction removal"

382 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 382 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Passes Judgment on Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award under Sections 47-49 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Dispute arose from Share Subscription Agreement and Put Option Deed involving investment exit rights.

30 Apr 2020

The petitioner, Banyan Tree Growth Capital L.L.C., a Mauritian investment fund, had invested approximately USD 7.5 million in Axiom Cordages Limited, ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision Striking Down Residence-Based Reservation in PG Medical Courses. Domicile or residence-based reservation in State Quota for Post Graduate Medical Courses violates Article 14 of the Constitution of India, as held in Saurabh Chaudri and Pradeep Jain.

1 Jan 2025

The case arose from the Union Territory of Chandigarh, which has only one medical college, Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh. The pr...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Directs Winding Up of Mutual Fund Schemes and Interprets SEBI Regulations. The Court examined the interrelation and constitutional validity of Regulations 39 to 42 with Regulation 18(15)(c) of the SEBI (Mutual Funds) Regulations, 1996, while deferring final adjudication pending statutory proceedings under the SEBI Act, 1992.

14 Jul 2021

The Supreme Court of India addressed civil appeals concerning the interpretation and application of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Mutual...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds FIRs for Illegal Mining Despite Compounding Under MMDR Act — IPC Offences Are Distinct and Not Barred by Section 22 of MMDR Act. The court held that compounding under the MMDR Act does not bar prosecution under the IPC for theft and criminal misappropriation, as the offences are separate and distinct.

1 Sep 2020

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals by private appellants and the State of Madhya Pradesh against the High Court's refusal to quash FIRs for illegal m...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Petition in Gratuity Calculation Dispute — Service Rules Cap on Maximum Gratuity Upheld Over Payment of Gratuity Act. Employer's restriction of gratuity to 8 years in second spell due to combined service exceeding 20-month cap under Rule 84 of Service Rules was valid and not violative of Section 4 of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.

10 Oct 2023

The petitioner, The Maharashtra State Co-Operative Adivashi Vikas Mahamandal Maryadit, challenged the orders of the Controlling Authority and Appellat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Caveat in Execution Proceedings — Caveat Under Section 148A CPC Not Maintainable After Execution Application Is Filed. Court Holds That Assignee Decree-Holder Can Execute Decree Without Notice to Judgment-Debtor Under Order 21 Rule 16 CPC.

2 Dec 2021

The petitioners, who are judgment-debtors in a pending execution application, filed a caveat under Section 148A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Administrator in Suit for Declaration of Void Lease and Possession, Setting Aside Single Judge's Order Dismissing Interim Relief on Limitation Ground. Court holds that Section 9A CPC requires preliminary issue on jurisdiction to be decided before hearing interim relief, but if court decides to hear interim relief, it must consider merits and not dismiss on limitation alone.

19 Jul 2012

The case involves two appeals arising from a judgment of a Learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dated 19 July 2010, on a Notice of Motion for...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Injunction in Electricity Act Dispute — LILO Scheme Not a 'Works' Under Section 164. Court holds that LILO scheme does not constitute 'laying of electric lines' under Section 164 of the Electricity Act, 2003, and that the District Judge correctly upheld the injunction against the petitioner.

9 Jan 2019

The petitioner, Century Rayon Limited, challenged an order dated 28 June 2018 passed by the learned District Judge-4, Kalyan, dismissing its Miscellan...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in Cricket Association Election Dispute — Interim Order Set Aside for Lack of Jurisdiction. Court holds that disputes relating to internal elections of a society are not maintainable in civil court without exhausting remedies under the Societies Registration Act, 1860.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves two appeals arising from a suit filed by Gopinath Munde against the Mumbai Cricket Association (MCA) and its office bearers, includi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Excise Duty Paid on Exported Goods Under Mistake of Law — Rule 13 Export Bond Not Used. Duty Paid Under Mistake of Law is Recoverable and Limitation Under Section 11B Central Excise Act Does Not Apply to Mistake of Law Claims.

24 Apr 2006

The petitioners, Tata SSL Ltd. and its director, exported consignments of Cold Rolled Sheets and Coils to Nepal by road. The goods were cleared from t...

35 36 37 38 39

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)