Search Results for "acquiring bank"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "acquiring bank"

586 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 586 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Regular First Appeal Against Decree for Specific Performance of Agreement for Sale — Appeal Filed Under Section 96 CPC Challenging Findings on Readiness and Willingness and Order II Rule 2 Bar. The Appeal Raises Issues of Maintainability Under Order II Rule 2 CPC and Proof of Readiness and Willingness.

11 Aug 2023

The dispute arises from a suit for specific performance of an agreement for sale of immovable property dated 15.03.2010 filed by the respondent-plaint...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Appeal Against Company Law Board Order Dismissing Petition. Court Frames Questions on Applicability of Section 111A and Section 43A of Companies Act, 1956 to Deemed Public Company.

14 Jun 2011

The appeal arose from a company petition filed by the appellants, members of the Kavasmaneck family, before the Company Law Board, Mumbai, alleging op...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Franchise Dispute: Breach of Contract Not Cheating Without Fraudulent Intent. Essential Ingredients of Sections 420 and 406 IPC Not Made Out as Dispute is Purely Civil in Nature.

29 Nov 2024

The applicants, directors of AN Retail Ventures Private Limited (ANR), sought quashing of FIR No.134/2021 registered at Osmanpura Police Station, Aura...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC — Plaint Discloses Cause of Action Against All Defendants Including Those Alleged to Be Benami. The court held that allegations of sham and benami transactions in a suit for specific performance constitute a cause of action and cannot be rejected at the threshold under Order VII Rule 11(a) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

19 Jun 2021

The Appellants, original Plaintiffs, filed Suit No. 187 of 1993 seeking specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 1st August 1985 in respect ...

Tribunals

NCLAT Upholds Sale of Corporate Debtor as Going Concern in Liquidation — Confirms Immunity Under Section 32A IBC. Liquidator's Application for Confirmation of Sale and Immunity Allowed Despite Objections from Suspended Directors.

27 Sep 2024

The appeal arose from a common order dated 27.09.2024 passed by the NCLT, Chennai, in IA(IBC)/415/2024, IA(IBC)/1701/2023, and IA(IBC)/1757/2023 in th...

High Court

High Court Quashes PMLA Proceedings Against Advocate Applicant in Money Laundering Case Involving Anil Deshmukh -- Properties Purchased in 2005-2007 Have No Nexus with Alleged 2020-2021 Proceeds of Crime

23 Feb 2026

The High Court allowed the criminal application filed by Applicant under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C., quashing the process issued against him by the De...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses State's Revision Petitions in Agricultural Income Tax Reassessment Cases — Reassessment Notices Barred by Limitation. The court held that the Tribunal's finding on limitation is a question of fact not open to revision under Section 55(1) of the Karnataka Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1957.

25 Mar 2014

The State of Karnataka filed multiple revision petitions under Section 55(1) of the Karnataka Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1957 (KAIT Act) against ord...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses State's Revision Petitions in Agricultural Income Tax Cases — Limitation Period for Revision Under Section 55(1) of KAIT Act, 1957 Is 4 Years and Cannot Be Extended. The court held that Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 is not applicable to revision petitions under Section 55(1) of the Karnataka Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1957, and the revisional authority has no power to condone delay beyond the prescribed period of 4 years.

25 Mar 2014

The case involves a batch of civil revision petitions filed by the State of Karnataka under Section 55(1) of the Karnataka Agricultural Income Tax Act...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses State's Revision Petitions in Agricultural Income Tax Reassessment Cases — Reassessment Notices Issued Beyond Limitation Period Invalid. The court held that reassessment proceedings under Section 35 of the Karnataka Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1957 must be initiated within the prescribed limitation period, and failure to do so renders the notice invalid.

25 Mar 2014

The case involves multiple civil revision petitions filed by the State of Karnataka against orders of the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal allowing appeal...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses State's Revision Petitions in Agricultural Income Tax Cases — Limitation Period for Revision Under Section 55(1) of KAIT Act Runs from Date of Service of Order. The court held that the word 'passed' in Section 55(1) must be read as 'served' to give effect to the right of revision, and the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal has power to condone delay under Section 32(5)(a) of the Act.

25 Mar 2014

The case involves a batch of civil revision petitions filed by the State of Karnataka under Section 55(1) of the Karnataka Agricultural Income Tax Act...

35 36 37 38 39

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)