Search Results for "Rule 403"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Rule 403"

764 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 764 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State's Revision Petitions in Asian Paints VAT Case — Input Tax Credit on Capital Goods Allowed Despite Non-Use in Manufacturing. Section 11(4) of KVAT Act, 2003 does not restrict ITC on capital goods used for generation of electricity for own consumption.

30 Apr 2014

The State of Karnataka filed multiple revision petitions under Section 65(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (KVAT Act) read with Section 9...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Seeking Mandatory Video Recording of Court Proceedings; Court Finds No Fundamental Right to Such Recording and Leaves Policy Decision to High Court Administration.

7 Jan 2016

The Bombay High Court heard two petitions together: a writ petition by Sunil Shantisarup Gupta and a criminal application by Indur Kartar Chhugani, bo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Intervention in Property Suit Appeal — Third Party Claimants Have Right to Be Heard Before Final Determination of Rights. Applicants who are not parties to the suit but claim independent title to the suit property are entitled to intervene in the appeal to protect their interests under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC.

16 Feb 2023

The present interim application was filed by two applicants, Arun Sampatrao Patil and Dilip Laxman Kuradkar, seeking to intervene in First Appeal No. ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Plaint in Property Dispute Between Siblings. Court holds that amendment seeking to add alternative claim for partition and separate possession does not change the nature of the suit and is necessary for effective adjudication.

11 Apr 2014

The petitioners, Barkatali Abdul Razzak Kazi, Noorjahan Gafoor Shijwalkar, and Aishabi Jabbar Thakur, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court c...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against BPCL Officials—Lack of Offence Under Essential Commodities Act, 1955 and LPG Distribution Order, 2000

27 Feb 2025

Absence of Statutory Violation—No Offence Attracted Under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955—Unauthorized Raid by Vigilance Squad Re...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeals in Part in Income Tax Dispute Involving Disallowances Under Section 14A, Section 37, and Section 10B. The court held that Section 14A disallowance requires satisfaction of AO, scientific research expenditure not allowable, demurrage is business expenditure, and Section 10B deduction remanded.

7 May 2021

The case involves appeals by the Commissioner of Income Tax against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which had partly allowed the...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Final Decree Proceedings — Upholds Allotment of Shares as per Commissioner’s Report. Appellant’s Contention That He Is Entitled to Constructed Portion of Joint Property Rejected as Such Plea Was Not Raised During the Suit or First Appeal, and Final Decree Must Conform to Preliminary Decree.

16 Feb 2024

The matter pertained to a regular second appeal before the High Court of Karnataka arising from final decree proceedings in a partition suit. The orig...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Subsequent Purchaser in Suit for Specific Performance and Injunction — Applicant Claiming Title Through Subsequent Agreement Must Be Heard Before Final Orders.

19 Nov 2013

The judgment arises from a chamber summons filed by Mugwort Land Holdings Pvt. Ltd. seeking impleadment as a party defendant in Suit No. 2823 of 2006,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Copyright Infringement Case — Plaint Rejection Set Aside for Non-Application of Mind. Court holds that under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, only the plaint averments must be examined for cause of action, not their truthfulness.

24 Jun 2016

The appellant, The Indian Performing Right Society Limited, filed a suit claiming damages for copyright infringement allegedly occurring at Kala Acade...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Public Interest Litigation Challenging CIDCO's Land Allotment to Private Developer in Navi Mumbai Under MRTP Act. Alleged Violations Include Absence of Open Tender, Lack of Government Approval for FSI Enhancement, and Unauthorized Land Use Conversion in Sector 30A Vashi, Under Sections 113, 154 and New Bombay Disposal of Lands Regulations, 1975.

21 Nov 2014

The case pertains to two public interest litigations filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Judicature at Bomba...

35 36 37 38 39

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)