Search Results for "Rule 28(6)"

433 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 433 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Rape of Mentally Retarded Woman in Himachal Pradesh. High Court's Reversal of Acquittal Upheld as Prosecutrix's Mild Mental Retardation Rendered Her Incapable of Understanding Sexual Assault.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Chaman Lal against the judgment of the Himachal Pradesh High Court, which had reversed his acquittal a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Dispute — Restores Arbitral Award for Compensation for Unproductive Use of Machinery. Court Holds That High Court Exceeded Its Jurisdiction Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by Reappreciating Evidence and Substituting Its Own View.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by M/s. Dyna Technologies Pvt. Ltd. against the judgment of the Madras High Court, which had set aside an a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Rape of Minor under Goa Children's Act and IPC. Testimony of victim alone held sufficient for conviction, delay in FIR explained.

The appellant, Deepak Nanku Singh, was convicted by the Children's Court, Panaji for the offence punishable under Section 8(2) of the Goa Children's A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Enforces Foreign Arbitral Award in Favor of Singapore Seller Against Indian Buyer. Rejects Objections Based on Conflicting Jurisdiction Clauses and Public Policy Under Section 48 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, M/s. Louis Dreyfus Commodities Asia Pte Ltd., a Singapore-based company, filed a petition under Sections 47 and 48 of the Arbitration ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Possession Suit — Appellants Entitled to Possession of Suit Property Based on Title and Adverse Possession. Permissive occupation does not create ownership; respondent failed to prove adverse possession or valid title.

The case involves a dispute over possession of a suit plot and house. The original plaintiffs (now appellants) are the sons of Marotrao Dhobale, the o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Visually Impaired Employee Under Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995. Termination Based on Pre-Act Medical Report Held Invalid as Employer Failed to Consider Alternative Employment Under Section 47 of the Act.

The petitioner, Ashok Dhondu Ahire, was appointed as a Peon on 28/04/1981 and later worked as a Messenger. By letter dated 22/09/1987, the Board of Re...