43994
1 Jan 1970The Supreme Court heard criminal appeals arising from a common judgment of the Madras High Court dated 06.10.2007, which upheld convictions and senten...
Search Results for "Railway service"
1546 result(s) found
Found 1546 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Daily Wage Employees in Industrial Disputes Act Case, Reinstating Tribunal Award. Termination Without Section 25F Compliance Held Void Regardless of Appointment Irregularity Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
27 Oct 2021The dispute originated from the termination of daily wage non-teaching staff at Sree Sankaracharya University of Sanskrit. The employees were initiall...
- 379
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Employer's Appeal in Gratuity Dispute — Trust Deed and Scheme Capped Gratuity at Statutory Limit Under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. Employer's Gratuity Scheme Did Not Abandon Statutory Ceiling; Employee Entitled Only to Statutory Maximum.
29 Apr 2020The appeal arose from a dispute between BCH Electric Limited (appellant-employer) and Pradeep Mehra (respondent-employee) regarding the quantum of gra...
- 285
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Adjudicates Claim of Transgender Teacher Alleging Discrimination and Termination from Two Private Schools under the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019. Court Emphasizes Necessity of Effective Implementation of Statutory Protections and Equality for the Transgender Community.
1 Jan 1970The Supreme Court of India, in a writ petition filed under Article 32 of the Constitution, examined the pervasive discrimination faced by transgender ...
- 72
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Peon Without Enquiry. Termination Order Held Stigmatic as It Referred to Prior Communications Alleging Misconduct, Requiring Disciplinary Enquiry Under Section 81 of Maharashtra Public Universities Act, 2016.
11 Aug 2023The petitioner, Sushind Kisan Rathod, was employed as a Peon at Rajashree Shahu Science College, Chandur Railway, which is run by respondent no.2, Atu...
- 68
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Considers Whether Dearness Allowance is a Fundamental Right, Hears Appeals Against High Court Mandate to Pay Central Rates. High Court's declaration of Dearness Allowance under Article 21 and direction for parity with Central Government employees challenged by State.
1 Jan 1970The State of West Bengal filed appeals by special leave challenging the orders of the High Court at Calcutta dated 20th May 2022 and 22nd September 20...
- 50
High Court
High Court of Karnataka at Dharwad Hears and Reserves Order on Writ Petition by State Seeking to Quash KSAT Order Setting Aside Compulsory Retirement of Village Accountant in Bribery Case — State Contends KSAT Erred in Treating Acquittal in Criminal Case as Bar to Departmental Proceedings Despite Different Standards of Proof
25 Sep 2025The writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India was filed by the State Government through the Principal Secretary and the De...
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds State Policy on Outsourcing Class IV Posts in Aided Institutions Under Intermediate Education Act, 1921. Regulation 101, as amended, was held constitutional as a valid policy measure based on financial constraints and efficiency, under Section 9(4) of the Act, without violating Article 14 of the Constitution.
27 Sep 2021The Supreme Court of India heard civil appeals filed by the State of Uttar Pradesh challenging a judgment of the Division Bench of the Allahabad High ...
- 592
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Retired Teacher Seeking Pension Benefits in Kendriya Vidyalaya Pension Case Due to Cut-off Date. Cut-off Date of 1st January, 1986 for Pension Eligibility Upheld as Reasonable Classification Under Article 14.
4 May 2006The petitioner, Sindhu Vishwanath Phadake, joined service as a teacher in Adarsh Vidya Bhavan School on 1st November, 1957 and worked until 24th June,...
- 77
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging State Labour Court Jurisdiction in Salary Recovery Dispute. Non-scheduled air transport service not covered by Central Government's definition under Section 2(a)(i) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, hence State Labour Court has jurisdiction.
11 Jul 2006The petitioner, MESCO Airlines Limited, an air transport company holding a license for non-scheduled air transport service under the Aircraft Rules, 1...
- 107
