Search Results for "Prevention of Corruption Act"

461 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 461 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR and Cognizance Order in Corruption Case Against Retired IPS Officer — Lack of Sanction Under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Court held that taking cognizance without valid sanction is illegal and proceedings are liable to be quashed.

The petitioner, Dr. S. Krishnamurthy, a retired IPS officer, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal of Doctor in Bribery Case. Prosecution Failed to Prove Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment dated 31st January 2012 of the Special Judge, Pune, acquitting Dr. Anil Kacharu Shinde, a medic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Petitioners in Corruption Case Involving Alleged Forgery of Will and Misappropriation of Property. Court Holds That Custodial Interrogation Not Required When Documents Are Already Seized and Petitioners Are Willing to Cooperate.

The petitioners, Eknath Ganpatrao Khadse (aged 72), Mandakini Eknath Khadse (aged 62), and Girish Dayaram Chaudhary (aged 50), filed a Criminal Writ P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Sub-Registrar in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as demand and acceptance of bribe not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Mohan Bhaiyyalal Shrivastava, was a Sub-Registrar at Barshitakli, Akola. He was convicted by the Special Judge, Akola in Special Case N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Ambadas s/o Ramaji Sahare, was convicted by the Special Judge, Wardha in Special Case No.3/1996 for offences under Sections 7 and 13(1)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Proof of Demand and Acceptance. Conviction under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to establish demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The judgment pertains to two criminal appeals filed by Pandurang Raghunath Dhimte (original accused no.1) and Balasaheb Vasant Godse (original accused...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Discharge of Accused in Corruption Case for Lack of Sanction Under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The court held that sanction under Section 19 is mandatory and its absence vitiates the prosecution, entitling the accused to discharge.

The case pertains to a criminal revision application filed by two applicants, Kisan Baliram Rathod and Vibhuti Radharaman Devnath, challenging an orde...