Search Results for "MRTU & PULP Act, 1971"

523 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 523 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds 60 Years Retirement Age for Workmen Under Model Standing Orders in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Employer's Reduction of Retirement Age from 60 to 58 Years Held Unfair Labour Practice Under Item 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal and Cross Objection against a judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court in Writ Petition N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Industrial Court Order Holding No Unfair Labour Practice in Continuing Daily Wage Watchman Without Sanctioned Post. Government Department Not Liable Under Item 6 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971 When No Permanent Post Exists; Compensation Paid on Equal Pay Principle.

The dispute arose from a complaint of unfair labour practice filed by a daily wage watchman who worked for the Directorate of Printing and Stationery,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union's Petition Alleging Unfair Labour Practice by Employer. Company's denial of permanency to 15 workmen held not to constitute unfair labour practice under Item 6 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971 as workmen failed to prove continuous service.

The petitioner, Maharashtra Association of General Workers, a trade union, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and order dated November 20,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Employee Retired Before Superannuation Age. Employer Failed to Prove Retirement Age of 58; Employee's Service Record Showed Superannuation Age of 60 Under Item 9 Schedule IV MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The case involves a writ petition filed by National Bicycle Corporation of India Ltd. (the employer) challenging an order of the Industrial Court date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions by State Employer Challenging Industrial Court's Order in Unfair Labour Practice Cases. Daily Wage Workers' Regularisation Upheld Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioners, the Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Pune, and the State of Maharashtra, challenged a common order dated 18 January 1999 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court's Finding that Senior Engineer and Engineering Assistant are Not Workmen under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Petitioners' Complaints under MRTU & PULP Act Dismissed as Not Maintainable Due to Lack of Workman Status.

The Bombay High Court dismissed two writ petitions challenging the Labour Court's orders dated 23rd July 1999, which held that the Petitioners were no...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Service Matter Due to Failure to Frame Preliminary Issues in Disciplinary Enquiry. Labour Court and Industrial Court Orders Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Procedure Under MRTU & PULP Act.

The petitioner, Pralhad Waman Lahane, was employed as a Banking Inspector at the Jalna District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. He joined as a Clerk on...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order Quashing Recovery Notice Against Employee. Recovery of Differential Pay After 25 Years Due to Employer's Mistake Held Unfair Labour Practice Under MRTU & PULP Act.

The petitioner, Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Court Order Directing Permanent Absorption of Temporary Employee in University of Mumbai. Employer's Practice of Engaging Temporary Employees for Years Without Regularisation Constitutes Unfair Labour Practice Under Item 6 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The University of Mumbai (Petitioner) challenged an order of the Industrial Court dated 16th December 1999, which allowed a complaint filed by Shri S....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Interim Order of Industrial Court Directing Continuation of Service in Permanency Complaints. Municipal Corporation's Writ Petitions Allowed Because Main Relief of Permanency Prima Facie Not Tenable Under Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act, 1949.

The case arose from individual complaints filed by employees of the Sangli, Miraj and Kupwad Cities Municipal Corporation under Section 30(2) of the M...