Search Results for "Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017"

426 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 426 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging GST Assessment Order for Violation of Natural Justice. Failure to Provide Personal Hearing and Proper Opportunity to Respond to Show Cause Notice Renders Assessment Order Invalid Under Section 75(4) of MGST Act, 2017.

The petitioners, Cowtown Software Design Pvt. Ltd. and its Associate General Manager Milind Karnik, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Con...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Show Cause Notices in Service Tax Case Due to Limitation and Lack of Jurisdiction. Multiple SCNs issued beyond normal period of limitation without proper justification under proviso to Section 73(1) of Finance Act, 1994 are invalid.

The petitioner, ATA Freight Line (I) Pvt. Ltd., a company engaged in freight forwarding and logistics services, filed a writ petition under Article 22...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Telecom Company's Claim for Refund of Entry Fee After 2G Licences Quashed Due to Illegal Government Policy. Restitution Under Section 65 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 Denied as Quashing Did Not Render Contracts Void, and Set-Off Policy Upheld Under Article 14 of Constitution.

The dispute involved a telecom company seeking a refund of an Entry Fee of Rs 1454.94 crores paid for 2G licences across twenty-one service areas, aft...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Carrying Cost in Change in Law Claims Under PPA — Restitutionary Principle Upheld. Article 13.2 of Power Purchase Agreement Entitles Generating Company to Carrying Cost from Date of Change in Law Till Approval.

The case involves appeals by Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. and Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. (Haryana Discoms) and Gujarat Urja Vika...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Two Brothers in IT Act Case — IPC Offences Not Maintainable in Light of Section 67 of IT Act. Non-obstante clause in Section 81 of IT Act overrides IPC for offences involving obscene electronic material, following Sharat Babu Digumarti v. Government (NCT of Delhi).

The petitioners, two brothers, filed a criminal writ petition seeking quashing of FIR No. 86 of 2018 registered at Shahupuri Police Station, Kolhapur,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against MSRTC Contract Termination Due to Breach of Contractual Obligations. Court Holds That Article 226 Jurisdiction Cannot Be Ousted by Agreement, But Petitioner Failed to Show Arbitrariness or Unreasonableness in Termination.

The petitioner, M/s S.K. Translines Pvt. Ltd., was awarded a work order by Respondent No. 5 (General Manager (Traffic), MSRTC) for carrying out the bu...