Search Results for "Arbitral Tribunal Jurisdiction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Arbitral Tribunal Jurisdiction"

1525 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1525 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Dismissal of Execution Application for Arbitral Award on Limitation Grounds. Execution of Arbitral Award is Governed by Article 137 of Limitation Act, 1963, Not Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

25 Sep 2014

The petitioner, Mahindra & Mahindra Financial Services Ltd., had granted a loan of Rs.3,95,000 to respondent No.1 for purchasing a tractor, with respo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Commodity Brokerage Dispute — Upholds Tribunal's Finding That Broker Failed to Prove Client's Liability. Member Client Agreement and Running Account Basis Did Not Shift Burden of Proof to Client Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

16 Apr 2015

The petitioner, Bonanza Commodities Brokers Pvt. Ltd., a member of Multi Commodity Exchange of India Ltd. (MCX), filed a petition under Section 34 of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Stay Application in Arbitral Award Challenge — No Automatic Stay Under Section 36 of Arbitration Act Without Strong Prima Facie Case. Court holds that mere filing of Section 34 petition does not warrant stay; applicant must demonstrate irreparable harm and balance of convenience.

14 Dec 2020

The judgment concerns an interim application filed by Kishor N Shah and others (the Shahs) under Section 36 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Clause Validity Dispute Under Lease Agreement. The arbitration clause designating the lessee's Managing Director as sole arbitrator is upheld as valid under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, absent contravention of public policy.

1 Feb 2022

The Supreme Court heard appeals by Indian Oil Corporation Limited against a judgment of the Bombay High Court. The dispute arose from a lease agreemen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Matter — Upholds Appointment of Arbitrator Despite Alleged Termination of Contract. Court holds that existence of disputes and arbitration agreement is sufficient for appointment under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, even if the underlying contract is terminated.

30 Nov 2023

The appellant, Madgavkar Salvage, a partnership firm, filed an appeal against the order of the Commercial Court rejecting its application under Sectio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award in Cotton Supply Dispute. Consolidation of Claims from Nine Contracts with Identical Terms Does Not Violate Fundamental Policy of Indian Law Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

9 Feb 2023

The petitioner, BST Textile Mills Pvt. Ltd., entered into nine contracts with the respondent, The Cotton Corporation of India Ltd., for the purchase o...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Sets Aside Dismissal of Arbitration Petition as Time-Barred — Finding No Valid Service of Award Where Postal Endorsements Showed Addressee Not Found. Section 34 Petition Held Within Limitation as Limitation Commences Only from Actual Receipt of Award Copy Under Section 31(5) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

4 May 2018

The appeal arose from a dispute over a software supply contract between the appellant, Logic Eastern India Pvt. Ltd., and the respondent, KEC Internat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Petition Filed Beyond Limitation Period as Application Under Section 33 Does Not Extend Time for Challenging Award.

27 Sep 2010

The petitioner, Shri Amit Suryakant Lunavat, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Case — Directs Arbitral Tribunal to Reconsider Interim Deposit Order in Light of Force Majeure Clause. Court holds that while passing interim measures under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the Arbitral Tribunal must consider the force majeure clause and the bonafide dispute raised by the lessee, and cannot direct deposit of 100% rental amount without prima facie evaluating the applicability of such clause.

28 Mar 2022

The dispute arose from two lease agreements between Evergreen Land Mark Pvt. Ltd. (appellant-lessee) and John Tinson & Company Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. (respo...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award in Commercial Dispute. Termination of Services Agreement by State Assembly Secretariat Held Illegal by Arbitrator; Court's Decision on Frustration and Party Distinctness Not Available in Provided Excerpt.

25 Nov 2025

Background: The dispute arose from an agreement dated 5 December 2015 between the Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly (UPLA) Secretariat and Tata Consu...

35 36 37 38 39

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)