Search Results for "unconstitutional provisions"

1378 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1378 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Amendment to DCR 33(7) Appendix III for Lack of Locus Standi and Bonafides. Petitioner failed to establish any public interest or personal injury, leading to dismissal with costs.

The petitioner, Mr. Imran Suleman Qureshi, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in the Bombay High Court challenging an amendment dated 21/05/2011...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Disposes of Challenge to Sections 17(2) and 32(1) Proviso of MMRDA Act by Consent. Land Acquisition by MMRDA Under Challenge: Petitioners Allege Unconstitutional Provisions in MMRDA Act, 1974.

The Bombay High Court heard and disposed of a group of matters comprising Writ Petition No. 841 of 2012, Public Interest Litigation No. 3 of 2011, and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010028192013_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Section 9A of Maharashtra Municipal Councils Act Requiring Caste Validity Certificate for Councillors. Provision Held Valid as It Is a Reasonable Classification to Prevent Fraud on Reservation and Does Not Violate Articles 14 and 243T.

The petitioners, elected councillors of Jalna Municipal Council from reserved categories, challenged the constitutional validity of Section 9A of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Amendment of Section 88 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. Insertion of Third and Fourth Provisos Permitting Government Extension of Time for Inquiry Against Delinquent Promoters is Constitutionally Valid and Not Retrospective Penal Legislation.

The dispute arose from an inquiry under Section 88(1) of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 initiated against former directors of the Ma...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Judicial Scrutiny of RBI's Supersession of Abhyudaya Co-operative Bank's Board. Balance between Constitutional mandates and banking regulations reaffirmed.

The Bombay High Court assessed the legality of the Reserve Bank of India's (RBI) supersession of the Board of Directors of Abhyudaya Co-operative Bank...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Tax Authorities in Madras Urban Land Tax Act — Act Held Constitutionally Valid. Levy of 0.4% on Market Value of Urban Land Under Madras Urban Land Tax Act, 1966 Not Violative of Articles 14 and 19(1)(f), and Retrospective Operation Reasonable.

The case concerned the constitutional validity of the Madras Urban Land Tax Act, 1966, which levied a tax on urban land at 0.4% of its market value. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside Interim Bail Granted by High Court in MCOCA Case, Condemns Forum Shopping. The Court held that granting bail in a writ petition challenging vires of MCOCA provisions, after withdrawal of a regular bail application, amounts to impermissible forum shopping.

The Supreme Court of India heard an appeal by the State of Maharashtra against an interim order of the Bombay High Court granting bail to the responde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Section 515A of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 Barring Civil Suits Against Demolition Orders. Provision held constitutionally valid as it does not oust writ jurisdiction and provides adequate alternative remedy.

The petitioner, Abdul Razzaq Sunesra, challenged the constitutional validity of Section 515A of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, inserted b...