WRIT PETITION NO. 5539 OF 2017
5 Feb 2019The petitioner, M/s. Veekaylal Investment Co. Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India in the Bombay High Court...
Search Results for "third party purchaser"
1220 result(s) found
Found 1220 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Impleading Application in Specific Performance Suit — Petitioner Entitled to be Heard Before Compromise Decree Affecting Her Rights. The court held that a person whose rights are directly affected by a compromise decree in a subsequent suit is a necessary and proper party under Order I Rule 10(2) CPC, and the trial court erred in rejecting the impleading application.
26 Aug 2014The petitioner, Smt. Narayanamma, filed a suit for specific performance of contract (OS 2289/2007) against respondents 1 to 3 based on an agreement to...
- 60
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Refusal to Condon 902-Day Delay in Setting Aside Ex-Parte Order. Delay of 902 days in seeking to set aside order 'Suit to proceed without written statement' not sufficiently explained; Court upholds trial court's refusal to condone delay.
22 Feb 2018The petitioner, Rupchand Rajmalji Jain (Sancheti), was defendant No.2 in a suit filed before the City Civil Court, Mumbai. The suit was originally fil...
- 140
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Second Appeal in Suit for Declaration and Injunction Involving Allegation of Fraudulent Sale by Forged Power of Attorney. The Appeal Challenges Reversal of Trial Court's Decree by First Appellate Court.
19 Dec 2024Background: This matter arises from a Regular Second Appeal filed by the plaintiff under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging...
- 19
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Partially Allows Specific Performance of Sale Agreement Despite Prior Oral Agreement - Vendor's Breach and Bona Fide Purchaser Protection. The court upheld the concurrent findings that the subsequent vendee is entitled to specific performance only of the portion not covered by a prior registered sale deed in favour of a bona fide purchaser without notice under the Specific Relief Act, 1963.
18 Sep 2020The case involves a dispute over the specific performance of an agreement for sale of land. The Vendor, B. Santoshamma, purchased 300 sq. yards of lan...
- 346
High Court
Bombay High Court Determines True Interpretation of Common Plots Conveyance in Favor of Co-owner Societies. The expression 'tenants in common' in the conveyance indicates absolute co-ownership, not a lease, and MHADA retains no title.
18 Jun 2024The plaintiff, Vithalnagar Society Ltd, a co-operative housing society, filed an Originating Summons seeking determination of the true interpretation ...
- 366
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Declaration of Trust and Accounts Against Bank in Palm Oil Import Dispute. Consent Decree in Prior Suit Bars Plaintiff from Claiming Sale Proceeds as Trust Property.
12 Mar 2015The plaintiffs, Bajranglal Anilkumar Jaju and Hitesh Anilkumar Jaju, filed Suit No. 824 of 1980 against The Vyasya Bank Ltd. seeking a declaration tha...
- 162
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Bank Auction — Bid Below Reserve Price and Without Earnest Money Rejected. Auction Sale Confirmed in Favor of Highest Bidder Despite Petitioner's Claim of Irregularity.
10 Jan 2011The Petitioner, Goldie Sud, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the public auction conducted by Punjab Na...
- 102
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Bank's Reauction and Deposit Forfeiture Under SARFAESI Act, 2002. Auction purchaser's failure to pay balance within stipulated time justified forfeiture, with liberty to pursue recovery through independent proceedings.
11 Apr 2023The appeal arose from a dispute involving auction proceedings under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Secur...
- 482
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Upholds Validity of Premium Floor Area Ratio Scheme and Rejects Challenges Under Articles 14, 21, 243ZE, and 300A of Constitution. Section 18-B of Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 and Section 38-D of Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 Held Not Violative of Constitution, and All Impugned Notifications Sustained.
15 Jun 2026The matter concerns a batch of cases challenging the constitutional validity of statutory provisions introducing the Premium Floor Area Ratio (FAR) sc...
- 57
