Search Results for "tax refund"

1171 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1171 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in Central Excise Classification Dispute — M/s. Tien Yuan India Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise. Classification of plastic components under Chapter 39 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 upheld over Chapter 84.

The appellant, M/s. Tien Yuan India Pvt. Ltd., was engaged in the manufacture of plastic components used in textile machinery. The Commissioner of Cen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Income Tax Department to Comply with ITAT Order and Release Seized Jewellery and Refund Within Six Weeks. Failure to Complete Block Assessment Within Limitation Under Section 158BE of Income Tax Act, 1961 Renders Retention of Seized Assets Illegal.

The petitioner, legal heir of Late Mr. Lakhpatrai Agarwal, filed a writ petition challenging the inaction of the Income Tax Department in complying wi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Revenue in Income Tax Reassessment Case on Limitation and Computation Grounds. Reassessment under Sections 147 and 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Held Valid as Assessee Failed to Disclose Material Facts, and Notice Served on Partnership Firm Was Proper Despite Section 282(2) Argument.

The dispute arose from reassessment proceedings under the Income Tax Act, 1961, involving a partnership firm engaged in publishing newspapers and peri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Petition for Refund of Excise Licence Fees Due to Delay and Laches. Claim for refund of Rs.2.86 Crores paid under Karnataka Excise (Rectified Spirits) Rules, 1967 for period 1997-98 to 2002-03 rejected as barred by delay and laches.

The petitioner, M/s. Kap Chem Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking refund of Rs.2.86 Crores paid as l...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Directs Cash Refund: Writ Petitions Grant Relief on CENVAT Credit. Judgement rules in favor of petitioners, mandates cash refund under Section 142(3) of CGST Act, 2017 for excess duty payments.

Writ Petition Outcome captures the essence of the court's decision to grant relief based on the interpretation of Section 142(3) of the CGST Act, 2017...