Search Results for "sentence concurrent"

725 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 725 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Unnatural Sex and Extortion Case — Mentally Ill Victim's Testimony Corroborated by Medical Evidence and Parents' Testimony Sufficient to Prove Guilt Under Sections 377 and 387 IPC.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by Ramcharan Ramavadh Yadav against his conviction under Sections 377 and 387 read with Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Improper Investigation. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Ashok Bhaguji Khadke, was convicted by the trial court under Section 302 IPC for the murder of Smt. Damyanti Kudale and under Section 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Conviction Under Section 138 NI Act for Dishonour of Cheque Issued for Repayment of Loan — Revision Dismissed as Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With

The revision petitioner (accused) was convicted by the trial court for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for disho...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Cheque Dishonour Case — Conviction Under Section 138 NI Act Upheld. Accused Failed to Rebut Presumption of Legally Enforceable Debt or Discharge, and Signature on Cheque Was Admitted.

The case involves a criminal revision petition filed by R. Hanumantharaya (the accused) against the judgment and order dated 02-01-2019 passed by the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits KSRTC Driver in Road Accident Case Due to Lack of Rash or Negligent Driving Evidence. Conviction under Sections 279 and 304A IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Culpable Rashness or Negligence Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Mohammad Hanif Jainum Khalifa, was a driver employed by the Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation (KSRTC). He was tried and convic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Rash Driving Case — Conviction Under Sections 279, 337, 338, 304-A IPC Upheld. Concurrent findings of fact by courts below not interfered with as no perversity or illegality found.

The petitioner, Athaulla, was convicted by the Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and JMFC, Gudibande in C.C.No.16/2007 for offences under Sections 279, 337, 338 an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows NIA Appeal Under Section 21(1) of NIA Act, 2008 Against Rejection of Tender of Pardon Under Section 306 CrPC — Held That Order Rejecting Pardon Application Is Not Interlocutory and Is Appealable.

The National Investigation Agency (NIA) filed an appeal under Section 21(1) of the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008, challenging an order dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Cheating and Forgery Case Due to Lack of Evidence. Conviction under Sections 417, 419, 420, 468 read with 471 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove charges beyond reasonable doubt.

The case involves a criminal revision petition filed by the petitioners (accused No.1 and 2) against the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 24....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka adjudicates criminal appeals arising from conviction of a bank employee and relative for conspiracy, forgery, and corruption. Convictions under various sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 were challenged before the High Court.

The appeals arose out of the judgment dated 26.12.2009 passed by the Special Judge for CBI Cases, Bangalore in Spl.C.C.No.29/2004, whereby the appella...