Search Results for "sales tax liability"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "sales tax liability"

786 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 786 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Includability of Bought-Out Items in Assessable Value of CKD Boilers. Appeal Under Section 35L(1)(b) of Central Excise Act, 1944 Challenges CESTAT Order Holding That Essential Parts Delivered at Site Must Be Included in Transaction Value for Duty Assessment.

1 Jan 1970

The Supreme Court heard statutory appeals under Section 35L(1)(b) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the common final order of the Customs, Excis...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Appeals in Central Sales Tax Assessment Dispute — Remands Matter for Fresh Consideration on Rate of Tax Applicable to Inter-State Sales. The court held that the assessing authority must consider the appellant's claim for concessional rate of tax under Section 8(1) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, based on the nature of the goods and the declarations furnished.

20 Mar 2015

The appellant, ABB India Ltd., is engaged in the manufacture and sale of electrical/electronic products and execution of work contracts for transmissi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Accumulated Input Tax Credit Under Inverted Duty Structure in GST — Rejection by Authorities Set Aside. Held that refund of unutilized ITC is admissible under Section 54(3)(ii) of the CGST Act, 2017 even when output supply is partially exempt, and that the formula under Rule 89(5) of the CGST Rules, 2017 must be applied correctly.

23 Apr 2026

The petitioner, CHEC-TPL Line 4 Joint Venture, a joint venture between TATA Projects Limited and another entity, was engaged in the construction of a ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petitions of Granite Dealer in VAT Dispute — Inter-State Sale of Rough Granite Blocks Not Proven as Export Sale. Assessee failed to discharge burden of proof under Section 5(1) of Central Sales Tax Act, 1956.

6 Jul 2018

The petitioner, M/s. Shanthakoti Enterprises, a dealer engaged in extraction and sale of rough granite blocks from quarries in Chamarajanagar, filed r...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Amalgamated Company Must File Return for Pre-Amalgamation Period. Section 153A Notice Validly Issued to Transferor Company Despite Amalgamation, and Failure to File Return Attracts Penalty Under Section 276CC.

1 Jan 2022

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) against the order of the Delhi High Court, which had ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in MVAT Case: Agreement for Software Bug Fixing Held as Service Contract, Not Sale of Software. Services provided under agreement for removal of bugs/errors in software constitute repair and maintenance services, not development or customization, and are not taxable as sale of software under MVAT Act.

18 Dec 2023

The appellant, Atos India Private Limited, is engaged in providing services relating to repair and maintenance of software and holds Service Tax Regis...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Validity of Section 55 of MVAT (Levy and Amendment) Act, 2005 — Purchase Tax on Sugarcane Upheld. Repeal Provision Deleted Before MVAT Act Came Into Force, So Sugarcane Purchase Tax Act Continues.

8 Sep 2011

The petitioner, M/s Vithal Sugar Manufacturing Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Review and Rectification Orders in MVAT Case Due to Lack of Jurisdiction and Violation of Natural Justice. Petitioner's claim for deduction under Rule 58 of MVAT Rules for works contract was wrongly rejected by review order passed beyond limitation period and without proper hearing.

3 Aug 2023

The petitioner, Kalpataru Power Transmission Ltd., challenged a review order dated 8th March 2021 passed by the Deputy Commissioner of State Tax under...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Consumer Protection Case on Applicability of Deposit Condition Under Old Act. The court held that the appeal is governed by the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, as the right of appeal accrued before the 2019 Act came into force, and the deposit of ₹50,000 under Section 23 suffices for entertaining the appeal.

15 Feb 2022

The appeal arose from an order of the National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission directing the appellant to pay a substantial sum with interest. T...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Assessment of VAT Refund Claims for Three Proprietary Concerns Under Section 48(6) of MVAT Act, 2002. Court Orders Finalization of Assessment for 2007-08 Within Three Months to Enable Set Off or Refund of Excess Input Tax Credit.

4 Feb 2015

The petitioners, three proprietary concerns, filed writ petitions before the Bombay High Court at Nagpur Bench seeking a direction to the respondents ...

34 35 36 37 38

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)