Search Results for "resolution professional"

562 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 562 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Part-Time Teacher's Pension Claim in Night Junior College Case. Teacher's 29 years of part-time service in a night junior college does not qualify as full-time service under MEPS Rules for pension eligibility.

The petitioner, Mrs. Rajani Rajan Dixit, a retired teacher, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Directs Bar Council to Act on Complaint Against Advocate for Alleged Misconduct in Landlord-Tenant Dispute. Professional misconduct includes conduct outside court; Bar Council must consider complaint under Section 35 of Advocates Act, 1961.

The petitioner, S. Kathavarayan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the first r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Summary Suit for Recovery of Loan Due to Unenforceable Oral Agreement and Lack of Written Contract. Loan advanced for litigation funding held to be a contingent agreement not enforceable under Order 37 CPC as it lacked a written contract and was based on an oral understanding.

The plaintiff, Vishal Kedia, filed a commercial summary suit under Order 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the defendant, Sureshkumar S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Dental College Trust Seeking Admission After Cut-Off Date. Central Government permission communicated after 30 September 2014 cut-off cannot be used for admissions in that academic year.

The petitioners, a trust and a dental school, applied in 2011 to establish a dental college with 100 student intake. The State Government issued an es...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Appointment of Public Prosecutor for Pune District Due to Non-Compliance with Section 24 CrPC. Appointment made without consulting the Advocate General and without considering eligible Additional Public Prosecutors violates statutory requirements.

The petitioner, Mrs. Neelima Sadanand Vartak, an Additional Public Prosecutor in Pune District since 1986, challenged the notification dated 1st June ...