Search Results for "reopening notice"

601 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 601 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice and Order for Deceased Assessee in Income Tax Case -- Investment in Debentures Not Escaped Income -- Notice Under Section 148 and Order Under Section 148A(3) of Income Tax Act, 1961 Set Aside

The judgment involves a writ petition filed by Petitioner, the legal heir of a deceased assessee, challenging a reassessment notice and order issued b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Full and True Disclosure. Petitioner's claim of set off of unabsorbed depreciation was disclosed in return and notes, hence no failure to disclose material facts.

The petitioner, Mukand Limited, a company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1913, filed a writ petition challenging a notice dated 26th Apr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Approves Compensation Scheme for Tribal Landowners in Coal Mining Acquisition - Mahanadi Coalfields Directed to Pay Compensation for Lands Acquired in 1987-1989. Market value determined as of 2010 survey date due to 28-year delay in compensation.

The case concerns the long-pending compensation claims of landowners, predominantly tribal communities, whose lands were acquired for coal mining by M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Independent Application of Mind by AO. Reassessment based on borrowed satisfaction from investigation wing without forming own belief is invalid.

The petitioner, Skoda Auto Volkswagen India Private Limited, challenged a notice dated 23rd March 2011 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Specific Performance with Exemplary Costs for Suppression of Facts and Forum Shopping. Plaintiffs failed to disclose prior pending suit and obtained ex parte orders by misrepresentation, leading to dismissal and costs of Rs. 5 lakhs.

The plaintiffs, Anand Agarwal and Pramila Anand Agarwal, filed a Commercial Suit No. 614 of 2017 before the Bombay High Court seeking specific perform...