Search Results for "rent increase"

535 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 535 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Husband's Revision Against Family Court's Refusal to Cancel Maintenance. Family Court's Order Upheld as Husband Failed to Prove Fraud or Change in Circumstances Under Section 127 CrPC.

The petitioner/husband, Prakash Eknath Dheple, filed a criminal revision application under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 197...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Property Tax Reassessment by Municipal Council. Held that the Municipal Council lacked jurisdiction to reassess property tax without prior notice and hearing, violating principles of natural justice under the Goa Municipalities Act, 1968.

The case involves a batch of writ petitions filed by residents of Curchorem, Goa, challenging the reassessment of property tax by the Curchorem-Cacora...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal in Raymond Ltd. Tax Case — Multiple Disallowances Deleted by ITAT Upheld. Pre-operative expenses, technical know-how payments, debenture issue costs, and lease rent deductions allowed as revenue expenditure under Income Tax Act, 1961.

The Commissioner of Income Tax-2, Mumbai (Revenue) appealed against the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 22 March 2007 for A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute — No Error Apparent on Record. Petitioner's challenge to SRA's refusal to grant occupancy certificate fails as review court finds no mistake or error in original judgment.

The petitioner, Mumtaz H. Khoja, filed a review petition against the judgment dated 16 October 2025 passed by the Bombay High Court in Writ Petition N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Amendment to DCR 33(7) Appendix III for Lack of Locus Standi and Bonafides. Petitioner failed to establish any public interest or personal injury, leading to dismissal with costs.

The petitioner, Mr. Imran Suleman Qureshi, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in the Bombay High Court challenging an amendment dated 21/05/2011...