Search Results for "protected tenancy"

538 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 538 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Decree on Admission in Lease Ejectment Suit. Court holds that disputed facts regarding renewal of lease and termination of tenancy preclude summary decree under Order 12 Rule 6 CPC.

The petitioner, M/s. Concrete Developers, a partnership firm, filed a suit for ejectment, possession, damages, and mesne profits against the responden...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Eviction Decree — Court Receiver Need Not Seek Separate Leave to Sue When Appointed with Full Powers Under Order 40 Rule 1(d) CPC. Notice Under Section 106 T.P. Act Demanding Immediate Possession Is Not Invalid If Suit Filed After Notice Period.

The plaintiff, the Court Receiver appointed by the High Court in Suit No.234 of 1987, was the receiver of the suit property 'Dev Ashish' at Peddar Roa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Will Execution Case — Upholds Trial Court's Finding of Suspicious Circumstances. Execution of Will Not Proved as Attesting Witnesses Not Examined and Propounder Failed to Dispel Suspicious Circumstances Under Section 63 of Indian Succession Act, 1925.

The appellant, Mr. Anthony Edward D'Aguiar, filed a First Appeal before the Bombay High Court against the judgment and decree dated 30th April 2012 pa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction Against Alienation of Property in Will Dispute Between Son and Father. Son, as sole beneficiary under mother's will, entitled to interim protection of estate pending administration.

The plaintiff, Uday Narendra Shah, filed a suit seeking administration of the estate of his deceased mother, Jayamati Narendra Shah, who died on 10 Ju...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Restores Trial Court's Decree for Mandatory Injunction. Court holds that the First Appellate Court's finding on possession was perverse and that the suit for mandatory injunction was not barred by laches.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the legal heirs of the original plaintiff, Shri Gurudas Yeshwant Pednekar, against the judgment of the Firs...