Search Results for "prior demand and refusal"

749 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 749 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Proof of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to establish demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Mahesh Ramesh Jadhav, was convicted by the Special Judge, Amalner, for offences under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit, Reverses Appellate Decree on Limitation and Necessary Parties. Limitation under Article 54 of Limitation Act, 1963 begins from date of refusal to perform contract, not from occurrence of contingency.

The case involves a Second Appeal filed by the original plaintiff, Vijay Madhavrao Budhale, challenging the judgment and decree of the District Judge-...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Wife's Appeal in Divorce Case on Grounds of Cruelty and Desertion. Wife's refusal to cohabit and emotional abandonment constituted mental cruelty and desertion under Section 13(1)(ia) and (ib) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

The appellant-wife and respondent-husband were married on 26.01.2007 at Nagpur. The wife stayed with the husband only for a brief period from 26.01.20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Cross-Appeals in Suit for Specific Performance and Injunction — Interim Relief Sought Under CPC and Commercial Courts Act. The suit concerned enforcement of a Negative Lien Letter and personal guarantees, with the plaintiff bank seeking to restrain alienation of assets.

The case involves cross-appeals arising from a commercial suit filed by Bank of Baroda against Dr. Bavaguthu Raghuram Shetty and Dr. Chandrakumari Rag...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Upholds Government Permission for Ford India Plant Closure, Dismisses Workers' Challenge. Closure Permission Under Section 25-O of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Valid as Government Considered All Relevant Factors and Provided Compensation.

The case involves a batch of writ petitions filed by 59 workers of Ford India Private Limited challenging the Government Order G.O.Ms.No.171 dated 28....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petitions Concerning Mandatory Nature of State NOC for B.Ed. Colleges Recognised by NCTE. Petitions Highlight Conflict Between Central Recognition Under NCTE Act and State Policy Not to Grant Additional NOCs.

The matter involved two connected writ petitions before the Bombay High Court. Writ Petition No. 4769 of 2005 was filed by Shrinath Shikshan Prasarak ...