Search Results for "notional service"

651 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 651 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Petition Challenging CAT Order in ACR Downgrade Case. Reviewing Officer's Downgrade Without Communication Violates Natural Justice; Employee Entitled to Promotion with Notional Benefits.

The Union of India and other petitioners challenged an order of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Mumbai Bench, dated 09/07/2015, which allowed the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Insurance Company's Appeal Reducing Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Due to Lack of Income Proof. Deceased's income assessed notionally at Rs.15,000/- per month as documentary evidence was insufficient and not proved.

The appeal was filed by Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Co. Ltd. challenging the judgment and order dated 03.08.2015 passed by the Motor Accident C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Appeal in Tractor Accident Case — Negligence of Driver Established, Compensation Enhanced. Deceased was unauthorized passenger in goods vehicle; insurer not liable but owner liable to pay enhanced compensation under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident claim where the deceased Sarasu died after being hit by a tractor while alighting. The claimants, her husband, m...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Madras Partly Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence of Driver Established, Compensation Enhanced. Standalone Own Damage Policy Does Not Cover Third Party Liability.

The case arises from a motor accident that occurred on February 11, 2022, when the deceased, Meena, was riding as a pillion on a motorcycle driven by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Partly Allows Appeal by BMTC in Motor Accident Claim, Reduces Compensation Due to Multiplier Error. Tribunal's Use of Multiplier '18' for Deceased Aged 30 Years Held Incorrect; Proper Multiplier is '17' Under Sarla Verma Guidelines.

The appellant, Managing Director of Motor Claims Hub, BMTC, challenged the judgment and award dated 01.01.2022 passed by the XIV Additional Small Caus...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claims for Death of a Minor and Injuries. Tribunal's multiplier of 15 for 17-year-old deceased set aside; multiplier of 18 applied as per Sarla Verma v. DTC, and compensation enhanced for pain and suffering and medical expenses.

The case arises from a motor vehicle accident that occurred on 22.10.2011 involving a lorry bearing registration No. KA-11/5719 driven by respondent N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal and Partly Allows Claimant's Appeal in Motor Accident Case — Negligence of Tractor Driver Proved, Compensation Enhanced for Loss of Future Earnings Due to Permanent Disability.

The case involves two appeals arising from a motor accident claim. The claimant, Babanna H. @ Babu, a loader, was traveling on a tractor-trailer loade...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Enhancement of Compensation for Minor Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Notional Income of Rs. 30,000/- per annum Applied with Multiplier of 18. Insurance Company's Appeal Dismissed for Failure to Prove Contributory Negligence.

The case involves two appeals arising from a motor accident claim. The claimant, H.A. Anil, a minor aged 17 years, was injured in a road accident on 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Partition Suit — Appellants' Claim for Share in Joint Family Property Upheld. Court holds that daughters are entitled to equal share in coparcenary property under Hindu Succession Act, 1956, as amended in 2005, and that the suit was not barred by limitation.

The case involves a Regular First Appeal filed under Section 96 read with Order 41 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment a...