Search Results for "limitation extension"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "limitation extension"

1140 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1140 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal by Industrial Development Board in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Board's Failure to Prove Title and Possession Leads to Dismissal. The court held that the Board, as a statutory authority, must prove its title and possession before seeking eviction, and its failure to do so results in dismissal of the appeal.

26 Apr 2016

The appeal was filed by the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board (KIADB) and its officers against the judgment and decree dated 12.12.2012 pas...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition as Time-Barred Under Section 34(3) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Delay Beyond 30-Day Condonable Period Cannot Be Excused Even If Sufficient Cause Is Shown. The court held that the limitation period for setting aside an award is three months plus 30 days, and no further extension is permissible, rejecting the petition filed one day after the 30-day period.

2 Apr 2016

The applicant, M/s Tirumala Roadways, filed a notice of motion seeking condonation of 30 days delay in filing an arbitration petition under Section 34...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Compensation Enhancement Petitions in Land Acquisition Act Cases — Remands for Fresh Determination of Market Value as on Section 4(1) Notification Date.

24 Nov 2022

The petitioners, owners of agricultural land in Wangaon, Taluka Soygaon, District Aurangabad, filed writ petitions challenging the compensation awarde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals in Property Partition Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed Under Section 100 CPC. Court held that no substantial question of law arose as the trial court and first appellate court had concurrently found that the suit property was joint family property and that the plaintiff had proved his share.

30 Dec 2020

The case involves four second appeals arising from a partition suit filed by the original plaintiff, Satchidanand S. S. Kacodkar (since deceased, repr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Compensation Redetermination Under Section 28(A) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Limitation Period Computed from Date of Knowledge of Award. Petitioners' application for redetermination of compensation held within limitation as time runs from date of knowledge of the award, not from the date of award.

25 Jan 2012

The petitioners, whose lands were acquired for the Mukane Dam Project, sought redetermination of compensation under Section 28(A) of the Land Acquisit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Public Purpose Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Acquisition for Housing and Rationing Facilities Upheld as Valid Public Purpose. The court held that the acquisition of land belonging to a public trust for providing housing and rationing facilities to the public is for a public purpose and the challenge after a long delay is not maintainable.

26 Sep 2005

The petitioner, Brahman Sahayak Sangh, a public trust registered under the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 and the Societies Registration Act, challeng...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Section 34 Petition as Time-Barred, Confirms Arbitral Award. Limitation for Filing Section 34 Petition Runs from Date of Receipt of Award, Not from Date of Filing of Wrong Remedy.

4 May 2016

The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an order of a learned Single Judge of the Bomb...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Cheque Bounce Case Due to Time-Barred Debt. Conviction under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Set Aside as Complainant Failed to Prove Legally Enforceable Debt.

31 Mar 2021

The petitioner, T.C. Chandraiah, was the accused in Criminal Case No.433/2013 before the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Channapatna, for an offence unde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Appellant in Arbitration Enforcement Dispute — Objections Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act Held Time-Barred Despite COVID-19 Extension Orders. Court rules that the suo motu extension of limitation by the Supreme Court during COVID-19 did not apply to the period for filing objections under Section 34(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as the limitation is prescribed under the Arbitration Act itself.

26 Aug 2022

The case involves appeals by Walter Bau AG, a German company, against the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) concerning the enforcement of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenge to Arbitral Award in Contract Dispute — Upholds Award on Most Claims but Sets Aside Interest Rate. Dispute arose from delays in crude distribution system project; court held that arbitrator's findings on delay and damages were not perverse but interest rate of 18% was excessive and reduced to 9%.

30 Oct 2015

The petitioner, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., challenged an arbitral award dated 30 June 2005 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act,...

34 35 36 37 38

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)