Search Results for "interlocutory order challenge"

1141 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1141 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act Against Interim Order in IPL Franchise Dispute. Court finds no misrepresentation in bid process and upholds arbitrator's order granting interim measures while imposing conditions on franchisee to protect BCCI's interests.

Background: The dispute arose from the Indian Premier League (IPL) franchise agreement between the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) and Ja...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Impleadment of Property Owner in Writ Petition Challenging Building Rules Due to Direct Impact of Interim Order. Owner's Building Sealed and Demolition Ordered Based on Interpretation of Interim Order Keeping New Rules in Abeyance Under Punjab Unified Building Rules, 2025.

The dispute originated from a writ petition (CWP No. 38742 of 2025) challenging the Punjab Unified Building Rules, 2025. The High Court passed an inte...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Interim Order Restraining Non-Compete Beyond Contract Term. Arbitrator erred in treating Joint Venture Company as partnership and enforcing non-compete clause beyond its stipulated duration under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The Commercial Arbitration Petition No.25 of 2021 was filed by Elster Instromet B.V. (Instromet) challenging an order dated 09/10/2020 passed by the A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Bank Account Suit — Plaint Rejected as Barred by Limitation Under Article 113 of Limitation Act, 1963. Exchange of Correspondence Cannot Extend Limitation Once Right to Sue Accrues.

The appellant, Shakti Bhog Food Industries Ltd., filed a civil suit in 2005 against the Central Bank of India and another respondent seeking a decree ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Plea to Quash Impleadment of Company in SFIO Prosecution. Application Under Section 319 CrPC Allowed by Magistrate Challenged by Former Managing Director.

The petitioner, former Managing Director of Megacity (Bangalore) Developers and Builders Limited, filed criminal petitions under Section 482 of the Co...