Search Results for "import trade control"

422 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 422 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeals in Excise Duty Exemption Withdrawal Case — Doctrine of Promissory Estoppel Cannot Bar Withdrawal of Exemption in Public Interest. Public Interest Overrides Individual Interest When Withdrawal of Tax Exemption Is Based on Health Hazards.

The Supreme Court of India heard three civil appeals filed by the Union of India against judgments of the Sikkim High Court and the Gauhati High Court...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Complaint Against Directors for Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC. Acts Alleged Were in Official Capacity, Making Sanction Mandatory Before Prosecution.

The applicants, Mr. Arvind Navinchandra Mafatlal and Mr. Hrishkesh Arvind Mafatlal, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Criminal Pro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State's Revision Petitions in Asian Paints VAT Case — Input Tax Credit on Capital Goods Allowed Despite Non-Use in Manufacturing. Section 11(4) of KVAT Act, 2003 does not restrict ITC on capital goods used for generation of electricity for own consumption.

The State of Karnataka filed multiple revision petitions under Section 65(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (KVAT Act) read with Section 9...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Reverses High Court's Order for Accounts; Holds Export Transactions as Sales Not Agency. Distinction Between Sale and Agency Clarified Under Indian Contract Act, 1872, Based on Contractual Terms and Course of Dealing.

The dispute arose between a trader in hides and skins (respondent) and an exporter (appellant) over the nature of their contractual relationship durin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of IT Rules Amendment on Fake News in Reference Opinion — Rule 3(1)(b)(v) of IT Rules, 2021 Held Not Violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(a), 19(1)(g) of Constitution and Section 79 of IT Act, 2000.

The present proceedings arise from a reference made under Chapter-I Rule 7 of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960 read with Section 98 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes State Order on Solvent Licensing for Repugnancy with Central Order. Maharashtra Solvent Raffinate and Slop (Licensing) Order 2007 struck down as ultra vires the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 due to conflict with Central Order of 2000.

The Petitioner, Indian Small Scale Paint Association Society, challenged the Maharashtra Solvent Raffinate and Slop (Licensing) Order 2007 as being re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Short Delivery in Multimodal Transport Due to Limitation Under Carriage of Goods by Sea Act, 1925. The court held that the suit filed beyond one year from delivery was time-barred and plaintiff failed to prove short delivery.

The plaintiff, M/s. Assobhai Bhanji and Sons, a registered partnership firm engaged in import and export of dairy and agro products, filed a suit agai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010822332025_1

The Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka heard two intra-court writ appeals filed by M/s MP24 Construction Company, the lead member of a cons...