Search Results for "foreign exchange regulation"

373 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 373 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Partnership Firm and Partner Against Penalty Under Customs Act — Double Jeopardy Plea Rejected. Penalty on firm and partner under Section 112 of Customs Act, 1962 is permissible as firm is a separate entity for penalty purposes.

The appeal arose from an order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) dated 12 February 2004, which reduced penalties impo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appellant's Appeal -- Reinstates Criminal Proceedings Against Executive Engineer Despite Exoneration in Disciplinary Proceedings Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988

The Supreme Court heard an appeal by the Karnataka Lokayukta against a High Court judgment quashing criminal proceedings against the respondent, an Ex...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Retired Civil Servant's Writ Petition Challenging Tribunal Order on Pensionary Benefits. Petitioner's claim for difference in pension based on notional promotion rejected as no right to promotion exists and claim is stale.

The petitioner, a retired civil servant, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 06....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Retired Civil Servant's Writ Petition Challenging Tribunal Order — No Entitlement to Difference in Pension Without Proper Claim. Petitioner failed to establish any legal right to differential pension under Karnataka Municipal Administration Service Rules.

The petitioner, Sadashivappa, a retired civil servant from the Karnataka Municipal Administration Service, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Deferral of Prosecution Authorisation Under Section 34 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Government Can Defer Consideration of Prosecution Authorisation Pending Adjudication of Underlying Industrial Dispute Under Section 10 of the Act.

The petitioner, M/S International Trimmings and Labels India Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Seizure of Vehicles Under Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 — Held That Seizure Without Notice and Hearing Violates Principles of Natural Justice and Section 105 of the Act Requires Show-Cause Notice Before Confiscation.

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions filed by owners of vehicles that were seized by the State Excise Department under Section 105 of the M...